... error. You’re equating a contrapositive with negation. They ... a contrapositive, negate both conditions and reverse them. (A-->B ... is equivalent to /B-->/A)
But negating a ... like A --> B is A some/B or A and /B.
...
... and premise.This is always a missing piece between premise and ... premise is A--->B, and conclusion is there fore A-->C ... , and your task is to find that B ...
... then that something is B (a thing I should not ... the logical map clear A --> B. Now the conclusion ... (forgone pleasures) some B (a thing I should not ... forgone pleasures –C- are –A- things I would regret ... Answer choice (D) fits like a glove (but uses –many- ...
... relationship is that a->b and not b-> not a are logically ... a theft that is a crime, there must be a law making that a ... crimes. Maybe there is just a single law?
... where the LSAT throws in a word people are unfamiliar with ... 'likely to attempt to start a business,' and for that reason ... first set out to start a business. . .I'm not sure ... English major.
Nevertheless, (A), (B), (C), (E) are terrible answer ...
... . To strengthen /A -> /B, we can say A -> B. For example, according ... A caused B, the author assumes that A is the only cause for B ... the same logic, if /A causes /B, wouldn't we also have ... /A does not happen, then /B does not happen, which is "A ->B"
... and that is a statement that works on a couple different levels ... work in the abstract (A --> B --> C, A --> C). A proper crutch allows you to ... provide more than enough for a properly motivated individual to grasp ...
That doesn't sound like a legitimate break :) If you really ... go cold turkey for a few days or more, ... you see them as symbols (A, B) as opposed to words and ... want to fit nicely into A, B, and C. If you ... go really slow for a LR question, try to ...
... .hopkins have you determined which passage you'll be using to ... doubt we can get through a whole passage, but I would like ... to take a stab at it and ...
@LSATKingsman I had a RC passage like this (out of the ... under your belt to have a real indication of where you ... can put that score in a better perspective.
Yup, it is correct. And @amipp170 is right also! Whenever you have A--->B and B-->A (which is what you have here if you take the contrapositive of the second statement), you can make the statements into one biconditional AB.
@Sheri123 LSAC has released 4 non-disclosed tests over the years. 3 of them are compiled in their Superprep book, each test titled A, B and C. A 4th test was recently released in Superprep2.
... . The conditional should be A--->[Not(B--->C)]. You can ... Not C, which gets you A--->(B Some Not C). So ... A. This would be (B--->C)--->Not A. Does this imply B ... --->C--->Not A? (The ...
... condition itself is a conditional statement, so A--->B SOME Not C ... is a different idea than A--->(B SOME ... relationship to A instead of being a discrete relationship between B and C ...
This is a Must Be False question. Think “ ... think this is a great example of a style of stimulus that ... this best by easily eliminating A, B, C and E because they ... on. I’m practically making a necessity/sufficiency flaw by explaining ...
... sequencing games with five pieces: A, B, C, D, and E. If ... you know that in a given world A, B, and C must respectively ... more efficient to just put a little switch on them, however ... is up to you, but a little arc on top going ...
... out can be defined as a mental fog and exhaustion that ... , you run the risk of a back slide in scores. If ... would drop everything immediately. Take a break until Friday afternoon. Sit ... and do a few LR questions, a few games and a RC passage or ...