@"Accounts Playable" Yes. I would treat "it is a given" and "for such" as premise indicators. "Given" would introduce evidence (premise) for a conclusion. Treat "for such" the same as you would "for".
Accounts playable is right, most of the causation weaken/strengthening questions that i have come across draw some correlation between two things and then make a casual conclusion that you either need to best weaken or best strengthen.
I usually bubble after every question, but I suffered a bubbling error in Oct that cost me 7 points, so I have been practicing doing after every page. Like @"Accounts Playable" said just do not forget to bubble!!!
@"Accounts Playable" said:
Part of me wants to attribute the difficulty of this question to the fact that it's an old question, but that seems like a cop out.
Makes me glad I didn’t try to get into law school in the early 90s.