HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| accounts | 1.2K | 1.3K |
| playable | 792 | 837 |
-
A confusion between conditional logic and causationHi 7sagers, I just had a confusion cause by PT 68 section 2 question 24. JY's explanation is if Hormone causes Stress, then reducing Hormone can redu…
bumping this because I think this is super important! The difference between causation and conditionality has always been a bit fuzzy for me but @"Accounts Playable" you made the distinction super clear! Thank you! -
58.4.5 Company president: For the managementI changed my answer to A during BR since B-E are really bad, but I am not seeing how the company president "takes for granted " (assumes) what answer…
@"Accounts Playable" Yes indeed. And you are correct that ac(C) states the opposite. -
58.4.16 Madden: Industrialists address problemsI don't really see how B is supported in the situation nor how D does not. Can someone evaluate my reasoning? The question stem is pretty weird.…
Hey there @"Accounts Playable" Let me just address ac( ... -
Meaning of "it is a given" and "for such"On PT 58.1.13, we have one of the harder main point questions. I got this one correct, but I want to make sure I am understanding the passage correc…
@"Accounts Playable" Yes. I would treat "it is a given" and "for such" as premise indicators. "Given" would introduce evidence (premise) for a conclusion. Treat "for such" the same as you would "for". -
7Sage vs. VelocityHi guys, I'm new here. Someone might ask the same question before, but I'm wondering if any of you have used/are using both Velocity and 7Sage? I…
... .
@"Nilesh S" and @"Accounts Playable" please share your thoughts too ... -
60.1.6 After an oil spillI cannot make heads are tails of this argument/figure out what it is talking about. I had no idea what any of the answer choices were doing since I …
Hey @"Accounts Playable", just attempted this PT today ... -
Strategy for guessing on questions?Any strategy used to guess, say the last 5 questions? Eg. BBBBB, ABCDE, ACAAC? Any strategy that is statistically beneficial?
Thanks @"Accounts Playable" liked the second link .. when I am out of time. -
63.3.2 Artist: Almost everyoneI got this question correct (D was the flaw I anticipated), but during the exam and BR, I couldn't come up with a reason to eliminate E. According t…
@Accounts Playable With flaw questions, there's ... -
Introducing: BR Group Interactive Intensive Fundamentals WorkshopsHey Gang! Before the June-testers's BR Group jumps into the PT phase, the 7Sage tutors would like to offer some free interactive sessions to work…
@"Accounts Playable" said:
Will there be a recording of them so I can watch them later?
not for this batch, unfortunately. Hopefully, if we get a good response, we’ll repeat certain popular topics. -
Any ideas on how to not worry/constantly think about Dec LSATI just can't stop worrying and think about the Dec LSAT I just took. I feel like I absolutely crushed it but there are so many what ifs. I'm even dre…
@"Accounts Playable" I wonder what he got on his lsat. -
Causation strengthening, Causation weakeningWhen it comes to CAUSATION strengthening and CAUSATION weakening questions, I know how to do them, but I have a hard time determining if causation is…
Accounts playable is right, most of the causation weaken/strengthening questions that i have come across draw some correlation between two things and then make a casual conclusion that you either need to best weaken or best strengthen. -
JD good for business professionals? Appreciate your thoughts.Hey all, I work in a business development role (partnerships, strategic relationships, sales, dealing with government red tape). I love getting pe…
@"Accounts Playable" said:
Nevertheless, law school ... points.
@"Accounts Playable" said:
In fact, I ... .
@"Accounts Playable" said:
Many of the ... -
JD good for business professionals? Appreciate your thoughts.Hey all, I work in a business development role (partnerships, strategic relationships, sales, dealing with government red tape). I love getting pe…
@"Nicole Hopkins" said:
@"Accounts Playable" said:
Many of the ... -
How do you attack questions that ask "What was explicitly mentioned in both passages"For Comparative RC how do you attack questions like this. The answers are usually a key term and very short. Is there any proven method or do you ju…
To add to what @"Accounts Playable" has said and I think ... -
Best way to bubble and why?Looking for what other people think. Thanks!
I usually bubble after every question, but I suffered a bubbling error in Oct that cost me 7 points, so I have been practicing doing after every page. Like @"Accounts Playable" said just do not forget to bubble!!! -
June Test Takers! Tonight! PT44 BR | 8pm ETOVOBR Group!!!! PT 44! <img src="http://www.frontroyalchamber.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Lets-Talk.jpg" > </center> Talk to your heart’s con…
@"Accounts Playable" !!!
Come back!! You were dropping mad knowledge for the #OVOcrew -
June Test Takers! Tonight! PT45 BR | 8pm ETBR Group!!!! <img src="http://ih0.redbubble.net/image.68932659.9553/sticker,220x200-pad,220x200,ffffff.u2.jpg" > </center> This is the secre…
... on improving RC. :/
@"Accounts Playable" Sad that I'll miss ... -
PT5.S1.Q12 - impact craters causedHey gang, I’ve been working through the Sufficient Assumption question bank, trying to turn my Level 3 and 2 questions into Level 1 questions (for…
@"Accounts Playable" said:
Part of me wants to attribute the difficulty of this question to the fact that it's an old question, but that seems like a cop out.
Makes me glad I didn’t try to get into law school in the early 90s.
