Hm, foolproofingLG alone was probably 100+ hours. 20 full PTs is another 90 hours just taking them, and then the time spent actually blind reviewing... I'd guess I spent at least 300 hours total spread out over 9ish months? Ended up with a 174 FWIW.
> @LSATcantwin said:
> Maybe consider doing the famous @Pacifico fool proof method for LG.
Hi, do you know if for the the 4th try thats when you time yourself with 35 min?
... to high 160s). Even though LG started out as my worst ... you need a breather from foolproofingLG. Maybe drill an LR question ... keeping LG as your focus.
As a side note, foolproofing ... has made my LG so solid that LR ...
... , while still wrapping up the LG (then rc) portion of the ... -1 in blind review of LG, so I think I want ... , you can really benefit from foolproofingLG. You want to go -0 ... on average on LG's. So take your time ...
I liked tackling lg first with the lower numbered ... pts on other sections besides lg). Think high quality br is ... the most important elements besides foolproofinglg.
... :
> I liked tackling lg first with the lower numbered ... pts on other sections besides lg). Think high quality br is ... the most important elements besides foolproofinglg.
That's actually ... trying a 3-5 day LG schedule, following by LR, ...
... about focusing more attention on LG, especially given that you already ... significantly improve your score through LG alone. Let's say ... respectable score.
LG is SO SO learnable. I ... You can also work on foolproofingLG and while still drilling in ...
First off, thanks for your now-famous Pacifico Method. Foolproofing will, in all likelihood, change my life (because of a much high lsat score) and you were a big part of that.
Did you prepare for 1L? Any crumbs of wisdom on this topic?
... . There is a tab labeled LG Drills for PrepTests 1 to ... the course descriptions the foolproof method for LG is included under all ... would offer that as a method if they don't give ...