Could @"J.Y. Ping" or another Sage chime in on the issues raised by @quinnxzhang and @"CantGetRight"? Which interpretation is consistent with LSAT logic?
@"CantGetRight" I've recently become discouraged at the pace of my preparation. Thank you for renewing my faith in this process. The advice you offer here, and elsewhere, is invaluable.
@"CantGetRight" Thanks for your great and ... the time mange to get all questions right on the first attempt ... time while getting all questions right.
@"CantGetRight" said:
unless you’re aiming for 178
Oh no I am not aiming for 178 :))) It became much clearer to me now. Thanks for answering my question in detail. I would be more than happy with -1 and -2 but still aim for -0.
@"CantGetRight" You crack me up, thank you:)
& yes we thought we were so cool that we had the same cordless phone/answering machine combo that was on tv show "Friends"
@"CantGetRight" @Mookittyy @MrSamIam, as of not my logic games i am getting 3 wrong, my LR I am getting between 7- 9 wrong in each section and my reading comp I am getting 5-9 wrong.