Thanks so much! I was not interpreting the conditionals properly and as obvious as it sounds I totally missed the eligibility as necessary to win, and instead interpreted it as a sufficient condition along with the other one. Makes so much more sense now
For those of you on the call who discussed principle questions ( @twssmith @bswise2 @dml277 @"Not Ralph Nader" etc) -- I put up my notes in the Study Guides/Cheat sheets area.
Hi @generationhar embedded conditionals usually occur when a conditional ... out the lesson on embedded conditionals https://7sage.com/lesson/mastery ...
... 't quite capture natural language conditionals. That is, an LSAT prob ... to approximate most natural language conditionals. From a formal point of ...
@"Stevie C" said:
I don't pay attention to this at all. I just transfer my choices to the answer sheet, even if it spells "BAD BAD BAD" I'm plowing forward
@"Stevie C" said:
I don't pay attention to this at all. I just transfer my choices to the answer sheet, even if it spells "BAD BAD BAD" I'm plowing forward
LOL has this happened and you noticed it during a timed test? haha
I certainly understand how you're feeling! Hope the blind review sheet does help out with this a little bit -- I keep them all in a big booklet and review as necessary. Keep calm and carry on -- us December postponers need to stick together haha.