Lol at game 1. I was thinking the same thing. 2 was definitely tougher and took longer so I left one blank that I was planning to go back to but didn't have the time... At least we might have a nice little 1-3 point curve
same boat you guys, I thought it was smooth sailing until i got to LG. 3rd and 4th game almost entirely guessed on. im hoping that some of those guesses are correct (went with C for the heck of it) and that there is a lenient curve.
Aren't those based on how difficult the test might be? So while you may want to get a generous -14 = 170 curve, it's just adjusted that way to account for the relative difficulty of the test.
... might have missed, checking different curve charts, running cumulative probability computations ... luck distribution and a -12 curve. I'm teetering on the ...
It was everyone guessing what the "curve" would be on the test which here is represented by the number of questions you could get wrong and still get a 170. It turned out to be a -12 "curve" so you could get 89 out of 101 and get a 170.
@runiggyrun agreed. And @"Grey Warden" just breath and take some time to internalize the concept. Don't sweat it. I think if a question like this appeared on the LSAT it would be one of the curve-breaker questions.