... will pay attention
o E or J → PA
Independent ... sufficient OR (SPLITS)
o E→
o PA
o ... />
[NOT] JU AND E]
=/JU OR /E → /JY AND /A C) C→A and A→C
= A←→C … Contrapositive is ...
... any contrapositives for simple conditionals (e.g. A -> B). You ... down contrapositives for complex conditionals (e.g. A or B -> ... ; C) if you struggle with those, ...
... . conclusions within the passage c. Section off opposing views
d. note any analogies e. mark any words conveying powerful ... emotion or opinion i.e. ludicrous, irrefutable, etc.
... bamboo
P---most-- >E
**Direction of the arrow ... [Few] dogs (D) are evil (E)
1. Some dogs are ... />
• Ex: All cats(C) are pretentious (P) C→P
• Negate ... can formulate the contradiction (i.e., the negations) by saying “ ...
Identity the Premise and Conclusion 1st then find the support between the P & C and try to make it better i.e, STRENGTHEN it. That's how I approach Strengthen questions.
... , which is unhealthy. C) Incorrect - it misleads people ... , which is healthy E) Incorrect - it distracts people ... log channels, perhaps? C) Incorrect - if the cable ... care about this info? C) Incorrect - extra regulations may ...
... A CONTRAPOSITIVE =/= /D some /C- YOU KNOW TOO LITTLE TO ... />
• Ex: All cats(C) are pretentious (P) C→P
• Negate ... cats are [not] pretentious C some /P
DENY ... can formulate the contradiction (i.e., the negations) by saying “ ...
... on anyone's preference? C) is wrong because it does ... installing the security system i.e. customer goodwill and this loss ... from losses by theft... E) is wrong because it does ...
There is only one conclusion. The fact both C and E label their picked sentence as THE conclusion should have made you kick E to the curb, since you already correctly identified with the last sentence as THE conclusion.