... 'm struggling a lot with Flaw questions. The problem I have ... I managed to identify the flaw from reading the stimulus, once ... ? Keep doing more PT? Review Flaw questions and do more drills ...
I feel like I have been struggling a little bit with these questions, especially with the new core curriculum compared to the old one. Does anyone have any advice on how to approach these questions, especially when it comes to causal logic?
I see flaw questions as the exact same as assumption questions. I ask myself "what do I need to assume to make this argument work." Then I look for the answer choice that basically says that assumption can't be made.
I have been working on flaw questions for a few days ... a start in tackling these flaw arguments. Also, should I be ... so much time on these flaw questions? I feel that flaws ... can spot them in the flaw questions it would possibly help ...
you MUST pre-phrase in weaken questions, this helped me immensely. By "pre-phrase" I mean, actively look for the weakness (where the author jumps from premises to conclusion), and find the flaw in that space.
Yea I looked at the question too and yes, your first post got the conditionals reversed. Nonetheless, the flaw still stands at it is.
The condition given and the premise do not match.