@"Giant Panda" Yes, it's worth reading! It helped me better understand flaws in general and the RC sections helped as well. Definitely worth reading if you're still having trouble grasping something or if you just need a different perspective.
what @danielznelson said. I always fail to anticipate correct answer doing a flaw question when i encounter multiple flaws. Usually i just get attached to first flaw i notice and sink the question. Pretty evil of LSAC!!!!
Learn flaws well. It helped me a ... go through the Wikipedia flaws (there are also books ... made flashcards on the flaws and this helped me ... found that by learning flaws and getting more familiar with ... know what kinds of flaws re-appear on the ...
I've been going down the list of most common flaws https://7sage.com/lesson/19-common-argument-flaws/ and creating my own arguments which utilize the flaws. This has lead me to a better understanding of the flaws.
... flaw questions are "cookie cutter" flaws: things arguments do over and ... would be to gather 25 flaws per day on the question ... memorized the list of common flaws and read Mike Kim's ... Trainer section on flaws. Now I really can see ...