What would the necessaryassumption be? I already perceived the correlation-causation flaw but couldn't fit that as an answer choice in this necessaryassumption question type
It's more that certain words should be red flags to get you to think in a certain direction rather than guiding you down that path. "At least" is a great example of this since it is a great chart signifier but not a foolproof one.
Don't foolproof in the curriculum and stop doing all the problem sets. Do only enough to get a feel for the topic and then save the rest for your PT phase to shore up any weaknesses.
If you look at the games menu in the app you can see all the categories in one place. Best thing to do is just foolproof those games and watch the videos.
... have you been doing the FoolProof for (not timewise, but how ... give you ~120 games to FoolProof. You don't have to ... that game section to your Fool proofing pile and repeat the ...
... are giving is a Sufficient Assumption. With the two premises, (one ... .
It's not a Necessaryassumption because, while the negation does ... much caffeine" limit.
A necessaryassumption always destroys the argument when ...
I would say "If she consumes any caffeine other than a cup of coffee on a given day, then that amount doesn't make her consume too much caffeine in a day" would be considered a necessaryassumption.
@Elle2015 If this were a necessaryassumption question, then I think you’d be on to something, employing the negation test. But this is a sufficient assumption question. So we need an answer that will make the argument valid.