For LR clearly. When you see a question involves heavy Lawgic say MBT MBF Parallel reasoning etc.. Do you start mapping the lawgic right away or read it first then read it again and Map it out?
Not all X are Y. Is this translated as X some (not)Y? Also, is Not all X are Y equivalent to X some Y? For the latter question, I know in English in certain contexts, the statement "not all" of something implies "some are."
... /lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-08/
For this particular ... question, I'm having trouble understanding ... auto-emissions, because of the fact that electric cars don't ...
... other 7sagers on tackling Flaw question types.
I have gone ... improve with these question types. Ive noticed these question types appear quite ...
... same mistake on a similar question in the future. ... still thinking that the question of whether adopting this ... fact reduce the "rate of traffic accidents" was still open to question ...