This was my first time taking the test and I had LR-RC-LG-LR-RC. I am hoping that the first RC was the fake one because the last RC had questions about women's rights, tipping....I think and am hoping that one was real because I think I did better on that.
Simply "opening" the window does not wreck the argument. The window can open one inch and be impenetrable for a human to fit into to break into. The difference between B and C is that B actually actively disqualifies a potential route into the house.
... that doesn't violate any rights AND most people favor -> ... that doesn't violate any rights and most people favor -> ... does not violate anyone's rights." "The" is pointing to "a ... ask, "does it violate any rights?" but if the law isn ...
... talks about respect for basic rights (plural), but the argument only ... it was arguing for basic rights of citizens for its own ... passage would talk about other rights as well and the harm ... from a lack of basic rights. This argument is only about ...
What?? That is something out of BRAVE NEW WORLD. So, they check out your interpersonal skills by recording your timed answer to some black font on a white screen? Even actors in monologue scenes play to a human dummy offscreen. Yowza.
... you cannot deny
That human activity has an appreciable large ... answer choice. The idea of 'human activity' only appears in the ... -natural cause then it's human caused. Natural can still encompass ...
... to weather patterns without having human involvement
... Natural (assumed to be human) causes of weather patterns. ... (beetles) that aren't human. Living organisms excludes natural ... humans (assumption non natural = human) that caused the weather ...
Congrats! Always inspiring to read posts like these. I'm also interested in working with refugees/immigrants/victims of human trafficking, so these survivors have been my inspiration to crush the LSAT and go to law school. Kudos to you!