HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| if | 76.5K | 135.2K |
| a | 137K | 438K |
| then | 29.6K | 42.4K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| but | 77.3K | 125.2K |
| not | 65.4K | 114.3K |
| otherwise | 2K | 2.1K |
-
is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... if I am wrong.
A or B is /A-->B and /B-->A ... is /A,/B
but, the A or B, but not both,
A/B or B/A
there ... are two possiblities
A, /B
B, /AWhen doing Parallel flaw...Do you focus on finding the flaw in the argument and then matching that to an AC? Like any other flaw q, just instead of naming it you find another e…
... be as simple as "If A then B, We have a B therefore A" or it could ... understanding of argument forms is not a panacea to every parallel flaw ... the conclusion and add a "maybe" or a "probably" when our original ...Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... same group. So if we represent it as **Not both rule** ... Z because this means that if V is in one group ... other groups (and if Z is in a group, V has ... > >
> > If we represent it as V ... group has at least A or B (but not both)" can be represented ...Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... same group. So if we represent it as **Not both rule** ... Z because this means that if V is in one ... other groups (and if Z is in a group, V ... gt;
> > > If we represent it as V ... at least A or B (but not both)" can be represented as A /B
...X can be warranted only by YHi guys, I was working through PT25/S3/Q7 when I read this phrase and wondered, "is it a biconditional?" "warranted" means "sufficient", so to re…
... would mean X -> Y, not the other way around.
If the sentence was a biconditional it would use a phrase like "but not otherwise."X can be warranted only by YHi guys, I was working through PT25/S3/Q7 when I read this phrase and wondered, "is it a biconditional?" "warranted" means "sufficient", so to re…
... would mean X -> Y, not the other way around.
If the sentence was a biconditional it would use a phrase like "but not otherwise."
but not otherwise" when determining the existence of ...Negating using "not"Can anyone help me with this negation? The sentence is: “The highest point of any volcanic ash cloud will eventually exceed an altitude of 5 km” …
... 5 km].
All [A] are [B].
If [A], then [B].
Negation:
not eventually exceed an altitude of 5 km].
Some [A] are [not B ... ].
If [A], then [not necessarily B].
Hope ...Negating using "not"Can anyone help me with this negation? The sentence is: “The highest point of any volcanic ash cloud will eventually exceed an altitude of 5 km” …
... km].
> All [A] are [B].
> If [A], then [B].
>
> Some [A] are [not B].
> If [A], then [not necessarily B].
>
A --> B negated /B--> /A
Im missing something ...LR missing things help!Hey guys, I need some assistance with my logical reasoning improvement? So yeah- basically what occurs is: I do the exam, Blind review, then I …
... is the lesson for "If and only If"
https://7sage.com ... -bi-conditionals/
For "if A then B unless C "
https://7sage ... with @buckmartin
You might not be reviewing the right way ... . And do not hesitate to go back to ...How do you y'all visually represent exceptions to condition statements in our "lawgic" language?A will go to B except when C happens. Maybe it can be done conditionally, I'm not sure. I've been thinking about writing C as a sufficient (either…
... ran into this problem on a PT a week or so ago ... words "if not". "If A then B, except when C" So that becomes "If not C, then the combined ... necessary condition (A --> B)" Is that a reasonable ...Question Regarding And + OrHi all! I just have a question regrading And + Or in the SC and NC and what happens when you Satisfy the SC through Valid Argument Form #1 and Deny …
... conditional statements.
A --> C , B -->C. Negating ... B or /C --> /A. /B --> /A because if A then B and C. /C --> /A because if A then B ... and C. You don't have to have both B ... and C negated to get not A.PT82.S2.G4 - A teacher will assign to each of three studentsI just have a question about Rule 3 which is, M-->S Contra: /S-->/M. Doesn't this mean that M and S always go together? If so, then how can number 23…
... and I will take a look shortly, but it sounds like this ... --> /M means that **if M then S** but not the other way around ... **satisfying the necessary** which does not trigger the rule AKA is ... becomes a floater** that could be in that AC or not in ...PT9 S4 Q04Lately I have been having a lot of trouble with "must be true" questions. Can anyone explain why C was the correct answer choice for this question, a…
... argument 1
If A then B
so
If not B then not A
The ... answer.
D is is a Mistaken Negation of the original ...Misreading rules!!Hi all! I keep misreading rules on logic games under time pressure. If a rule says “when J is in Y cannot be in,” I’ve read it as “when J is in Y has…
... br /> > read visual representation - "if A then B"
>
> ... - "if A then B" = "If JY buys an alligator then he must buy a bonobo." ... only take a few seconds. No longer if not faster than ... whatever you're already doing. If ...PT71.S3.Q24 (Cameras and Concrete) - Does the Video have the Contrapositive Mixed Up?The 7sage video says that the stim. says: <del>S</del> -> (U or C) thus, <del>S</del> -> (<del>C</del> -> U) But this doesn't seem right? …
Thats not a contrapositive. He's saying in the world of S, you must have U or C. Therefore in the world of S, if you don't have C then you have to have U.
If A, then B or C.
A
B
_______
Therefore CAdvice for Jan LSATHi everyone, I need some advice on the upcoming Jan LSAT. I constantly read stories on here of people scoring 170+ and I feel like such a failure …
... are about the same but I'm a little worse. My raw ... BR). I struggle with everything, but LG has gotten better. I ... : Ex on a Parallel Flaw: "If A then B. C is a B. So C is a A." Any ... was so foreign to me but it gets easier and faster ...Either/Or ElseHi, Can someone please explain either A or B or else is this the same as saying either A or B but not both?
Hi,
Can someone please explain either A or B or else
is this the same as saying either A or B but not both?Conditional/Or rulesRule: "J will arrive after M or before N, but not both" Correct translation: N and M arrive before J or they both arrive after J. (N- J) …
In my understanding the OR rule indicates that one of them MUST happen. It cannot be that both cannot happen. It's either M-J or J-N. One of these two must happen.
A or B but not both means one must be in at the exclusion of the other.Or, Not Both (LR And In-Out Games)Can someone please be so kind to read my notes from the particular lessons listed below? I do not know which definitions are correct. Different lesso…
... can be also selected)
"Not both" means only one or ... is selected
"Either A or B, but not both" means one must be ... neither
"At least one, but not both" means one must be ... are pretty much the same, but questions might word them differently ...PT49.S4.Q08 - ancient relicI had it down to A and D and chose D. With that said, can someone destroy my reasoning for why A is not the right answer so that this sticks... Ok…
... passes through area A and B but not C. According to the stim ... it. Now lets say ac(A) happens and pollen from area ... the relic was in area A or B and adhered to it ... relic passed through area C...But it didn't, so ac ...LR Question Justify the conclusionAn argument states that: Maria won this year's sailboat race by beating Sue, who has in each of the four last years. We can conclude from this that M…
... following two premises: (i) If A then B; (ii) A. Then, if those premises are true, the ... conclusion B must be true as ... the following premises: (i) If B then A; (ii) A. Even if those premises are true ...Group 3 Logical Indicators problemsJust started Group 3 Logical Indicators, and I'm confused. I'm not confused about the process (or at least I don't think I am). With Group 3 Indicato…
... easy and simple "if-then" statement. Everyone knows what "if A, then B" means. So the ... indicators are just helping you take a more ... grammatical sentence and convert it into the simplistic "if this, then ...is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?is that if A, then not B, and A or B, but not both the same thing?
... have milk or juice, but not both" is not the same thing as ... milk or juice is selected, but not both.""
The ... the original statement "A or B, but not both" there is not a possibility or probability ... /> https://7sage.com/lesson/or-but-not-both/contrapositive of A or B but not both... Clarification plzI understood "A or B but not both" as one of the followings: 1. A(O) B(X) 2. A(X) B(O) 3. A(X) B(X) Then what is the contrapositive of it? …
Actually! FYI for anyone who came into see this question... you can't apply both rules! Use only one of the rules to apply and the remaining variable simply becomes negated!
.
.
Therefore, A or B but not both
= /A ---> /Bcontrapositive of A or B but not both... Clarification plzI understood "A or B but not both" as one of the followings: 1. A(O) B(X) 2. A(X) B(O) 3. A(X) B(X) Then what is the contrapositive of it? …
... /> > Therefore, A or B but not both
> = /A ---> /B
... @"work all week" wrote, "A or B but not both" = /A B, A /B.
The ... negation of the conditional statement is A ...A > Either B or C. and then No C... What Must Be True?Problem: PT 2 - S2 - #13 To simplify, If A then, either B or C. And we were given No C. What Must Be True? 1. No A 2. or Can we still say A >…
If A then B/C.
~A.
Therefore, we can still have B and C.
If we are given no C, we need to have B in order to have A.
A -> B
~B -> ~AMBT - Conditional logic Question typeHi Guys, Can you please help with this question ? Either A’s faction or B’s faction, but not both, will win control of the government. If A’s fa…
... /> > Holy guacamole, this is a licensed GMAT question? Business school ... />
Sorry, the note had a mistake. It's from _ ... .) Please rephrase it like "_Either A or B, but not both, will win...._ ...Quick conditional question on contraspositivesHello Everyone, I wanted to know that if A -> B + C (with the + being "and") Then the Contra would be /B or /C -> /A And in another situ…
... is in the outcome (If A then B AND C) then you can separate them ... B —> C
Contrarily if “OR” is in the outcome (If A then B ... or C) then you have to keep ... in the trigger (If A or B then C) then you can separate it ...I suddenly don’t remember how I solved NA QsHi yall! So I am taking the test in a few days and I just totally forgot how to I solved NA questions. (I know this sound so dumb and ridiculous)…
Another way to think about it it is that it "closes the argument loop". "If A then B, therefore B." Necessary assumption would be A, because it's the piece that's missing.Are these lawgic translations correct?#1 A cannot B without C. Translation: AB --> C /C --> /AB #2 A without B cannot C. Translation: /AB --> /C C --> AB I'm curiou…
... by: a cannot b without c
Molly can't jump if she ... t have shoes
if Molly jumps then she has shoes
bc if it is ... three things just make Jump "A" and shoes "B"
if A then B
if /B then /a
