HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| lr | 21.4K | 37.5K |
| rc | 18K | 31.1K |
| lg | 16.7K | 27.6K |
-
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... :
> > I had LG--LR--LG--RC--LR
> >
> ... ; > RC was really really hard. I ... had a mental breakdown. First LR for me was a bit ... the easier side. The real LG was easy, the experimental one ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Hey, so I had LR LG LR LR RC
On my 2nd LR (3rd section) I had something about clerics exaggerating how religious peasants are, and I was wondering if you can help me figure out if this was the experimental section? Thanks in advance. -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
How many different LR experimental sections are there? I ... light in space. I had LR-LG-LR-RC-LR I think? 1LR seemed hardest ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> Had 3 lr sections. Does anyone know if ... />
Bumping, also i had LR LG LR LR RC
The lemurs/high ... was in in the 2nd LR for me (the 3rd section ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > Hey, so I had LR LG LR LR RC
>
> On ... my 2nd LR (3rd section) I had something ... that question. My experimental was LG, so I'm pretty sure ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Does anyone know if the order is the same even for matching section orders:
Example: I had LR LG LR LR RC
is my first LR the same as someone else's first LR that had this format as well? -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
If someone had:
LR - LG - LR - LR - RC - which LR was experimental? -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... had:
LR - LG - LR - LR - RC - which LR was experimental?> @JDtobeeee ... @CrystalBoomBoom said:
> > LR - LG - LR - LR - RC
> >
> > LR - LG - LR - LR - RC
> >
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC. Any idea what the question distribution for LR was? Remember it being 25-26-26 for some reason.Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; @jcylin93 said:
> Had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC. Any idea what the question ... distribution for LR was? Remember it being 25 ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Isn't it possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first? Etc? How can you determine from order alone?Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the ... inside from this -27 on RC I'm about to get ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR-LG-LR-LR-RC
Really hoping the first section of LR was ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the ... inside from this -27 on RC I'm about to get ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... > There was an RC experimental passage about abstract thinking ... an experimental LR section (3 LR sections) broken down as LR LG LR LR RC.
Btw-- RC as the 5th ... section after 2 LR sections is ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... who didn’t have experimental LR remember a question about investment ... for me second of three LR sections and I’m wondering ... the experimental. My order was LR, LG, LR, LR, RC
It was ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ,
Had LR, LG, LR, LR, RC.
All the LR's were really ... me :( I remember the 2nd LR section had a question (towards ... were part of the experimental LR...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... one 25Q LR and one 26Q LR. My test order was LR LG LR; LR RC, with ... the first two LR's ... had 2 RC or 2 LG sections to ID as many LR Q ... and Grand Theory (Marx/Freud). LG was Machiavelli/Shakespeare Villians, Movies ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ,
>
> Had LR, LG, LR, LR, RC.
>
> All ... the LR's were really hard for ... me :( I remember the 2nd LR section had a question (towards ... were part of the experimental LR..
--I had 3 ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the ... inside from this -27 on RC I'm about to get ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR, LG, LR, (break), LR, RC
My first LR was legit.I screwed up ... the second LR ... score. I remembered my first LR had 25 questions, the second ... questions were in the third LR section but I knew the ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
Do you ... />
Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in ... the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). I think ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
>
> ... /> > Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in ... the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). I think ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
>
> ... /> > Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in ... the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). I think ... haha. Thanks!!!
2 LR's and did not have ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> & ... ; Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in ... the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). ... 1 experimental section to LG then? I remember this ... /> Ugh it sucks having LR as an experimental cuz it ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> >
LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in ... the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). I think ... !!!
>
> 2 LR's and did not have ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> < ... ; Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in ... the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). ... > ANYONE WITHOUT 3 LR SECTIONS: Do you recall a ... the first section of LR was the experimental because ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... anyone who had only two LR sections:
> > > ... ; > Once again, I had LR LG LR LR RC, and this question was in ... the 2nd LR (3rd section overall). I think ... ; >
> > 2 LR's and did not have ...
