HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| lr | 21.4K | 37.5K |
| rc | 18K | 31.1K |
| lg | 16.7K | 27.6K |
| june | 9.5K | 13.1K |
-
Two PTs a day?Hi, I'm aiming for September, 2017, and I'm lagging behind on my PTs. Would it be a good idea for me to start taking two PTs a day? (I'm currently ta…
... (rule mistranslation) I made in LG that accounted for the -2 ... necessarily count on -0 LR & RC on test day and it ... spending the entire week drilling LG form and procedure, I _might_ ... -
PT 74: is this PT difficult or what?So I just took it and completely bombed it. I found LR to be extremely difficult and it is a strong section for me. Anyone think this PT sucked or…
> @LSATcantwin said:
> PT 74 was average for me on LR. RC however ripped me a new one.
LG was cake, RC had 2 tough passages but I got through them. LR on the other had for me just like.. lol I feel like a complete idiot after that -
Favorite LSAT section distribution?Hey all, Just wondering what yall's preferred distribution of the sections is on the LSAT! Mine is definitely: 1. LR 2. RC 3. LG 4. LR …
1. RC
2. LR
3.LG
4. LR
RC is my worst so with a fresh brain I think I'd do a little better -
4 / 5 PT sectionCan somebody please explain that to me? I was under the impression the that LSAT was 4 sections with the additional section for the writing sample...…
... 5 sections long: 2 LR, 1 LG, 1 RC, and 1 extra of ... -
Favorite LSAT section distribution?Hey all, Just wondering what yall's preferred distribution of the sections is on the LSAT! Mine is definitely: 1. LR 2. RC 3. LG 4. LR …
LR 1st, RC 2nd. Then the other LR and LG can switch off in slots 3 and 4 ;) -
How do I get out of this plateau?Hi guys, So, I'm over here frustrated trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong. I can't seem to get out of the mid 150's range -- and I have bee…
... getting -0 or -1 on LG, then you should foolproof all ... increase your BR score in LR/RC. You should write your own ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
Can anyone confirm which LR was the expert ... . one? (My last LR section had [removed] question as ... last question)
Also, for RC the judges was the real ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... said:
> I had LR, LG, LR, (break) LR, RC
> Can anyone ... confirm which LR was the expert. ... one? (My last LR section had [removed] question as ... )
> Also, for RC the judges was the real ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... 3 LR. 2 lr and lg before the break. The first 2 lr were ... easy. I misread a rule on lg, went ... I halfassed the last lr and rc. Rc first 2 passages weren't ... bad. My third lr was very ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; I'm hoping the judges RC section was experimental. It was ... thought LR was on the medium to harder side and LG was ... easier
Was hoping the same thing for RC ... crying forever! Also agree about LR and LG.
