Somebody correct me if I am wrong , but there are explanations for every logic game and for logical reasoning and readingcomprehension there are explanations for PT 17 and up which has been plenty for me :).
... for those questions.
For readingcomprehension, in order not to waste ... go find some dense argumentative reading online or some dense academic ...
Think of readingcomprehension as a longer logical reasoning question. The background information or opposing point may have more sentences, but the point and supporting information should be about that same (even if more fleshed out).
> @akistotle said:
> I once tried to make a list of all the common flaws.....But then I gave up. :sweat: So here is a partial list:
>
> **5) Causation confusions (correlation-causation flaws)**
> PT20.S1.Q10; ...
... can be answered just after reading passage A, and you can ... the lines while I'm reading them. Then, I don't ... question. Since I'm already reading those sentences anyway, it winds ... out some of the "harder readingcomprehension" problem sets, and see what ...
Like if this were a readingcomprehension passage and the question was asking me about the authors tone. I would answer something like "mild frustration" not "concerned caution" lol
that's pretty strange. you might have got sections swapped around compared to my one. my one starts : 1st SECTION (25), After readingComprehension 2nd Section (26) and after 15 minute break LR (25)
> @tekken1225 said:
>
> My friend who read these things for enjoyment over the course of years, is basically a readingcomprehension savant. Thinks RC in this test is a joke.