@2RARE2CARE said:
all the way question types can be asked...
I wouldn't get too worked up on this one ... they're always introducing new wordings for QT's. Going through sections (like one of the PT's used for PS/drilling) ...
... ) unless there are clear logical indicators that will help me out ... to diagram are clear logical indicators/existential quantifiers (the latter more ...
They key is to understand why 4 are wrong, and 1 is right. You might memorize the answer but I you know why 4 are wrong, and 1 is right...you're doing it right!
There is a group 2 indicator (only) and a group 4 indicator (cannot) in that sentence. So you can use either one, but generally it's easier to use group 4 indicators as negations and use the other one as the logical indicator.
@"Accounts Playable" Yes. I would treat "it is a given" and "for such" as premise indicators. "Given" would introduce evidence (premise) for a conclusion. Treat "for such" the same as you would "for".