... I don't want to delay application if at all possible ... />
You should absolutely get to -0 or -1 on games which ... . You definitely can get to -0 or 1 in logic games ...
... where you are to a -0 in logic games would get ... you your 9 points then I would say ... games are regularly -1 or -0, and to study until they ...
... where you are to a -0 in logic games would get ... you your 9 points then I would say ... games are regularly -1 or -0, and to study until they ...
... where you are to a -0 in logic games would get ... you your 9 points then I would say ... games are regularly -1 or -0, and to study until they ...
... in, with one or two "0-5% chance of getting in ... and Northeast schools bolded): 9 **University of California—Berkeley** 9 University of Virginia
11 ...
... CC, your BR should be -0 just about every time. I ... score could be with a -0 LG, but you also have ... score to come easily. -9 is -9. It's pre-fool proofing ...
Going from 160 to 166 requires you to get another 9-10 questions right. It would be impossible for me to make that jump. I'm not saying it would be impossible for you, but you'd probably have to put in at least 200 hours of studying. Why not delay?
Are you able to delay a cycle and apply the following year? Cause you would have significantly better chances getting the GPA above 3.0, studying more for the LSAT, and applying early for Fall 2020 instead. Also depends what your diversity factors are.
... only 160 I did get -0 RC, and I really loved ... you were able to go -0 on RC in 35 minutes ... I'd have a 4.0 but, I haven't. 0 GPAs and top LSAT scores ... you found a way to delay a cycle, you could take ...