I agree with your hunch, here. Not all strengthen questions involve a necessaryassumption, but I think that every "eliminate the weakness" variant does.
Yeah, I'd agree with that. Any time you provide an unstated necessaryassumption, you are strengthening the argument. This is a great example of how essentially interrelated the question types really are.
The reverse ... time) would be a sufficient assumption: as you said, they couldn ... failed. In the contrapositive, the necessary is satisfied. Either way, we ...
This is a necessaryassumption question. The answer will be ... back, they may still be NECESSARY. I.e. there are other ... BE the case (it is necessary) for us to draw our ...
@Frostbyte It was a an NecessaryAssumption question. I can see how your line of reasoning applies to other question types but would it apply to this one?
@"S.P. 170", it doesnt make a distinction between the levels of stress
... difference between a sufficient and necessaryassumption is incredibly subtle, and distinguishing ... is the key to answering "necessaryassumption" type questions on the LSAT ... .
... they are connecting a very necessary gap in the stimulus. So ... red. But this is also necessary at the same time. If ... and its both a sufficient assumption and necessaryassumption. It's an NA ...
... . What a profoundly subtle, yet necessaryassumption on that question..
necessary assumption will be the sufficient assumption. For an example ... useful lesson. A necessaryassumption question that has an assumption that is also ...
... Zubair Sounds like Weakening and NecessaryAssumption questions where there are like ... at least for Flaw and NecessaryAssumption, there are tests you can ... the main flaw and for NecessaryAssumption you can deny the answer ...
... alternate cause can be a necessaryassumption of every causation argument drawn ... ), but there were plenty more necessary assumptions for this argument. Can ... you think of any other necessary assumptions this argument makes?
> @DumbHollywoodActor said:
> it's helpful to know that blocking an alternate cause can be a necessaryassumption of every causation argument drawn from correlative premises.
... not a sufficient assumption. It's a necessaryassumption ("assumption on which ... />
(C) is a classic necessaryassumption wrong answer. It's too ... was a good sufficient assumption), or rather it includes ...
... is not a sufficient assumption. It's a necessaryassumption ("assumption on which the ... argument **depending** on one specific assumption for the conclusion. Classic mistake ...
... about connecting any dots on Necessaryassumption. It's not like ... Sufficient assumption where you have to ... especially with questions like Nec. assumption where there are a whole ... questions. If something is a necessaryassumption, then you know it ...
... 4 straight days of sufficient assumption questions. These were a real ... anyone. If you miss several necessaryassumption questions, an intensive might be ...
... 4-5 days for necessaryassumption questions. One of the ... is that sometimes, with necessaryassumption questions: **_nothing is too ... the LSAT to consider a necessaryassumption. Consider: PT 39- ... after a profoundly obvious assumption that absolutely must be ...
... to look like a sufficient assumption. A necessaryassumption to this argument could ... those two ideas is a necessaryassumption. But LSAC knows that students ... to know for sure an assumption is necessary is to employ the ...