HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| old | 3.9K | 4.8K |
| lr | 21.4K | 37.5K |
| s | 69.2K | 125.1K |
-
September Sabbath Observer Experimental?Wanted to see if anyone else took the test today and, if so, which was the experimental section? I had 2 readings. I believe the second had a thin…
@ariellentb I had 3 LR's - was the question with the black and white chameleon real? How about the one with the dolphin at 25 meters -
Blind Review Group | PT 46 | Wednesday, September 28th | 7 pm ESThttps://tilt-blog-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/28170011/ibfoqBT169nmnW.gif BR Group Returns! I won't be there for this one, but …
... - at least do the 2 LR's with hopefully a chance for ... -
Official September LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official September LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the September 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground ru…
@KevinSage I knew it. I thought I was going crazy. Had 3 LR's sadly. Would've loved an experimental LG @"Cant Get Right" -
40+ age group LSAT takers?I can't be the only 40+ person here who is going to change careers? Chime in if you fall into that group - and if you want to create a skype type st…
... /back-by-popular-demand-the-old-timer-s-thread-30-only-valid ... -
Have they started to ask those old question types that they stopped asking?example; PT79S4Q5 So they are disagreeing each other about what value means: property value vs. value itself has (not necessarily property value) …
... br /> I just finished drilling LR from 1-38, one of ... they also had a LR question asking you to ... said the new LR is distinct from the old LR but I ... you practice a lot of LR though, you start to ... and paradox questions in both LR sections.
@"Alex ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the December 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground rule…
can some one comment, who had only two LR's, some of the questions that went together in each of the sections -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the December 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground rule…
... />
I also got two LR's, and don't remember touching ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the December 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground rule…
I had 3 experimental LR's 25-25-26... did anyone else have this and figure out which one was experimental -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the December 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground rule…
@sd2813 Yeah lots of disagree q's... I found that too.
I had LR-RC-LR-LG-LR.
Found the first two LR's (s1/s3) okay, but after the LG section, I lost my cool for s5 LR. -
How valuable is re-doing old PTs?The user and all related content has been deleted.
I've found going back through old problems to be one the most useful things I have done so far. I haven't gone back through old PT's (though I plan to), but I've gone back through most of the CC twice now and the second time through really helped. -
Your 7Sage difficulty rating for each section of the December test?Personally, I would go RC: 1* LR: 2* LR: 2* LG1: 2* LG2: 2* LG3: 4* LG4: LOLNope*s
I had RC LR LG LR LG
RC was way easier for me and it is the section I do the worst in.
LR's were expected. Few difficult questions that I had to come back to.
LG was different(harder) than most PT's but doable. -
Warming up before a PT? IF so how much?I read in the past in some 180er's blog that he used to do a LG section before each PT to warm up. So I started doing that. 1 section of LG, usually …
@bswise2
I think redoing old LR (1-30) for warmup will ... up yesterday with 2 sections (LR+LG) and I felt overworked ... -
Is drilling by Q type effective when you've studied for the LSAT for a long time?Hi all, I've been studying the LSAT for a long time (over a year). So I am basically familiar with concepts and what each Q type asks us to do. Bu…
@lsnnnnn0011 said:
LR is the section I am ... I have is to retake old LR sections and see which ones ... -
Official February LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Yeah, like having the same letter three times in a row was getting me annoyed. I was like you Mc A-holes lol I dont know what my experimental was, I had three LR's, all 26 questions. smh... -
Sabbath Observer February Test Threadcollecting all thoughts about the Monday February test
I had 3 LR's. The first was easy, 2nd was a little hard and the last one was really hard. I think the games and reading weren't so bad. -
Memory Method/How to approach questionsSo I am currently working on incorporating the memory method into RC and have had mixed results. I'm losing a lot of time on the questions portion. W…
... doing this drill- take an old LR and complete it while choosing ... you.
I think LR strategy is different for everyone ... -
LG Fool Proof Method (Quick question about time!)Good morning everyone, I hope everyone has a great day at work/studying! Quick question... In the fool proof method for logic games, **_are we sup…
... have per game, just like LR's 84 seconds. Some games shouldn ... just like we would on LR, don't underestimate "easy" games ... -
Should I do complete PT while taking the lessons,or finish all the lessons first and than do the PT?a
... thread is almost two years old. It's best to just make ... ) don't recommend it. There's lots of study materials on ... -
June LSAT 2017 LRHow did people find this section? It seemed pretty smooth but not enough to compensate from the hardest RC ever
... experimental section (I had 3 LR's); if the two 25-question ... LR sections were real, I thought ... breezed through the 26-question LR section, which was my 3rd ... -
PT dilemmaSo i studied for 3 months and sat for the december LSAT, were i received a score i was unhappy with. During that time i studied in a hap-hazardous wa…
So the consensus is that it's ok to drill LR/RC/LG from 1-35, correct? I am planning to take PT's from the 50's and up from now till September. I would think it's not good to be drilling from LR's 50 and up since we'll be taking these PT's correct? -
PT dilemmaSo i studied for 3 months and sat for the december LSAT, were i received a score i was unhappy with. During that time i studied in a hap-hazardous wa…
... consensus is that it's ok to drill LR/RC/LG from ... planning to take PT's from the 50's and up from ... good to be drilling from LR's 50 and up since we ... 'll be taking these PT's correct?
Correct. Drilling ... -
September RetakeSup y'all, So just got my score back (159), but I really wanted closer to a 165 so I def plan on retaking it in September. My weakest section was …
... assumption questions in the couple LR's I got wrong. Definitely going ... -
(Another) Question about BR'ing PT'sHey Everyone, Hope everyone is progressing through their studies. I had a quick question regarding BR methods for PT's. I have heard several peop…
... a pretty stellar method (it's long but if you have ... the time it's worth doing), and then for ... noon BR one of the LR's and do another section (RC ... ) and then do the second LR section and other RC/LG ... -
Took PT 80 like you guys said...W.T.F? 167 -8 in one LR section? 6 in a row... -0 in RC? Do I even know this test? You guys are trolling me.... I've NEVER gone -0 in RC and…
... as in review.
LR was kind of weird though ... averaging like -2 for both LR's combined but ended up bombing ... this PT's LR and got a 170 while ... and -0LG.
it's weird, but review it and ... seem so bad.. it's weird, for sure. -
Took PT 80 like you guys said...W.T.F? 167 -8 in one LR section? 6 in a row... -0 in RC? Do I even know this test? You guys are trolling me.... I've NEVER gone -0 in RC and…
... .
>
> LR was kind of weird though ... like -2 for both LR's combined but ended up bombing ... this PT's LR and got a 170 ... /> >
> it's weird, but review it and ... 't seem so bad.. it's weird, for sure.
... -
Took PT 80 like you guys said...W.T.F? 167 -8 in one LR section? 6 in a row... -0 in RC? Do I even know this test? You guys are trolling me.... I've NEVER gone -0 in RC and…
... > >
> > LR was kind of weird though ... like -2 for both LR's combined but ended up bombing ... this PT's LR and got a 170 ... >
> > it's weird, but review it and ... 't seem so bad.. it's weird, for sure.
... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
> @kgh2112 said:
> Does anyone know if the tarantala LR question was in the real or experimental LR?
>
I only had 2 LR's, that tarantula question was real -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Isn't it possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first? Etc? How can you determine from order alone?
