@dcdcdcdcdc said:
A is wrong because it could be that her daughter is just very wise at birth. Isn't this the same as saying a tree could just start off with a lot of rings?
@MrSamIam The reason LSAC cited was that people were sharing them. And I'm sure that's true. But of course, restricting purchasing has very little to do with restricting sharing. I'm sure the test writers could have told the Board of Trustees (pictured ...
Yes the assumption unstated is that "as a family" is less pervasive. But ac-A comes in and contradicts this assumption and weakens (perhaps destroys) the argument. Good analysis :-)
You have: P1: someone can see history as ... of the sufficient condition in P1. It behooves us then to ... rewrite P1 as: /hold clear and unambiguous ... P2 to the contrapositive of P1:
increase in history --> ...
PT 9 S3 Game 3 - The School dance game. The sort of game that I would have lost my shit on had it been on the real deal, but taking the time to split the game boards and make all necessary inferences makes the questions a breeze