No worries guys, they work again, woohoooooo!! Thanks for your help @Pacifico and thanks @"Dillon A. Wright" for the help i'm sure you'd have given once you saw it, but panic over!
@Pacifico @c.janson35 , I got it! Just figured out by answering the same question for another poster. The correct answer is an example of strengthening causal arguments with correlation.
Staying active on the forum is actually helpful!! =D
@Pacifico: definitely true. I don't. The questions are sort of new, but the mental process of the passage itself, that's what I'm missing the second time.
It is very difficult to get above 170 if your BR score is below 170. BR 170 is definitely the Necessary Condition for getting 170. Just like @Pacifico said.
Thank you, I reread the Reading Comp section in the Trainer and it mentions the same strategy. @Pacifico. I will try to read the magazines you recommended. The subscriptions are just costly. Any student discounts?
I found student subscriptions @Pacifico. I guess I'll start with the New Yorker. I usually read The atlantic and Huffington Post. Hopefully I will familiarize myself with new vocabulary. Thanks again!
@StopLawying What pacifico said. I finished the course a week ago and have been doing nothing but logic games since. It's only been a week but I'm seeing improvement.