Here is a _very_ partial list of correlation-causation flaws:
PT20.S1.Q10 (★★★), PT20.S4.Q14 (★★★), PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★), PT31.S2.Q9 (★★★★), PT64.S1.Q5 (★), PT65.S1.Q8 (★), PT66.S4.Q25(★★★)
3:44: "Or, maybe they did in fact have a HUUUUGE boner for Homer but there wasn't enough Homer to go around."
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-21/
... the structure.
In PT31 Section2Question 04, the sentence with "what ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-04/
https://7sage.com ...
2. I also don't get ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-3-question-12/)
). ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-2-question-08/)) As @"Jonathan Wang ... every single parallel reasoning question). Regular chess is also ...
... is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question gives us:< ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
> ... comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer choice ... well: please see PT 22 Section2Question 25. Here we might be ...