... as a trap when the question stem asks for a necessary ... an example, PT 44, Section 4, question 7 is relevant. https://7sage ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question-07/
This question is still confusing me after ... the explanation. I thought the question stem was Pseudo Sufficient Assumption ... strike me as a strengthen question to begin with.
... understanding the explanation behind this game, which is also explained in ... /lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-1-game-4/
https://7sage.com/lesson ... /sequencing-game-wa-twist-3-game-board-setup/
... is my reasoning for question 18 in section 4 for prep test ... 62. Since this is a sufficient assumption question ... this particular type of SA question.
Alright, this was a confusing question but I'm still a ... I said, this begs the question as to what type of ... I pretty much answered my question in thinking this all through ... />
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-3-question-19/
... "silly" mistakes when reading split game boards. Those mistakes are probably ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-83-section-4-game-4/
2. https://7sage.com ... /lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-3-game-2/
In this game and all the explanations it ... M or P be used 4 times? Nothing was explicitly stated ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-4-game-4/
In regards to PT31 Game 2 question 8, if the rule states /A and/B —-> C, then the contrapositive would be /C —-> A or B. My question is, can both A and B be in (I.e. at least one is in) or is it just either A or B, not both. Thank you!
Hi All-
When negating answer choice C -> is this interpretation correct? “One eminent scientist trained by J.J. Thomson was not a creative researcher before coming to study with him. OR -> More than one eminent scientist trained by J.J. ...
This game has virtually no rules to ... , but I couldn’t finish game4 in 20 minutes. I technically ... guess the last 4 answers because there are infinite ...