@bbank0218 @DByrne07
I had the same setup! I definitely had the same section1 and section 5 LR, but I'm pretty sure I had a different section 3. I think that was the experimental one.
Absolutely! Section1 went somewhat well (RC), I felt pretty good about section 2 ... 'm not mistaken, my third section/second RC was the experimental ... I hope it was! 4th section (LR) didn't go so ...
... mean: Diagraming conditionals: PT 36 Section1 question 11. Before I decided ... apply conditional logic to the 1 star MBT questions, if you ... people that can do 35-1-22 by not diagramming it ...
@lllllllll said:
Because McElligott's citrus juices HAVE NOT BEEN LINKED TO ANY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS, can't I assume that they contain less infectious bacteria than M'S apple juice?
No, you can never assume. All we know is that the ...
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-1-question-16/] correct answer choice ... the difference between PT 29.1.16 answer choice B and ... .
... ; > I had LR for section1,3,4 and I remember ... relieved. My experimental was definitely section one
>
> ... ; I also had LR for 1,3,4 but I remembered ... a question from 1 that someone who doesn't ...