This is a good question. I should have been clearer in the video. I updated the lesson with a brief write up: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-73-section-4-question-21/
> @Sami said:
> and I have not done this particular PT so I can't just go in and check the sentence for you or why exactly JY wrote "past". That would ruin a fresh PT for me. From the first sentence above it's not necessary to write the word " ...
... particularly daunting example: PT 27 Section4Question 14. What I recommend ... bringing into this question is this basic framework:< ... here? The answer to that question is one of the ** ...
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-73-section-4-question-26/
>
> ... SA AC in a NA question is wrong, BUT there have ... SA AC in a NA question is both Sufficient and Necessary ...
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-4-game-1/
> 4:36 but I feel like ... have done it closer to 4 minutes if I had just ... .
>
> "PrepTest 33 – Section4 – Game 1
> 5 ...
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section4question 20.