A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?
I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not some situation.
Please give us the option to see which answers we eliminated/crossed out when looking at our preptest answer results. This would help us see our original thought processing when blind reviewing and when going over final results.
Can we take a preptest again if we've already done so, and if so, how do we do that? Also, can we do the preptest untimed? I understand we do that during the blind review, but can we chose to change the time
...
Question 21 on PrepTest 40 Section 1:
Pizzerias ...
B = Pizzerias C = Utilize direct-mail marketing more ... E provides: A -> C (Restaurants that record -> ...
Conclusion says: B -> C (Pizzerias -> utilize direct- ...
Which section on Preptest 40 was experimental? And in general, for past Preptests, how can we find out which section was experimental and which one wasn't?
... correct - but not sure why (C) is wrong. I think I ... 'm not understanding (C) correctly. What does it mean ... would be self-contradictory? Is (C) wrong because self-contradiction ≠ falsehood ... give me an example of (C) since I'm not exactly ...
Hello everyone! I took the baseline PrepTest in the beginning of the course, but haven’t yet taken another one to gauge my progress. I’m about 20% through the LR course- how often should I be taking the PrepTests?