When reading through the logical reasoning bible i have and going through the drills i find myself subconsciously following the same technique for both question types which leads me to ask what is the difference?
If sufficient fails then no valid conclusions ... the necessary condition, but if sufficient satisfied or affirmed then it ... then it would trigger the sufficient, hence we can have a ...
I always freeze when I read answer choices that say "takes a necessary condition to be a sufficient condition". I know in the abstract what they each are, but thinking through applying them as flaws is very difficult for me. Any tips?
I've been having issues with Link Assumption and Conditional Reasoning questions. Does anyone have any good resources (7sage live classes, syllabus, outside books, etc.) they suggest to improve on these questions types?
... />
First of all, the assumption that is being made here ... . And with this assumption, LSAT will ask you to strengthen, weaken, identify ... to do these:
1. Strengthen: X was removed, and Y ...