They're not above confusing/misleading question stems though. I found PT 78 LR to be really tricky on this. In review, there were several questions where I realized that I'd functionally misidentified question stems.
I did all the LGs from PT1-20. And I wrote every other PT from 1-20, and BRed them. I found it helpful, but I'd prioritize the games. Doing the more recent full PTs is almost surely a better option.
... of them! I initially used PT1-10 to drill sections, then ... stamina I started PTing with PT 20-35 timed. This ... if you used the older PT's you are bound ... again, and from those PT's I realized Necessary Assumptions ... then work on that first. PT and see how you are ...
... that it has taken me 1 calendar year: about 1200 games ... from scratch. Start with PT 2 Game 1. Do it three times ... it cannot go in spot 1. These are the reoccurring inference ... time.
I just read the stems of all 29 weaken except question through 7Sage's question bank filter from PT1-79. I did not find a construction like the second one you referenced.
... the list does not include PT 11 game 4: the ... not contain PT 41 game 4, PT1 game 1, PT B Game ... 3, PT C game 4 ... : the historical precursor for PT ... rule substation question on pt 57 was on the easiest ...
... the list does not include PT 11 game 4: the ... not contain PT 41 game 4, PT1 game 1, PT B Game ... 3, PT C game 4 ... : the historical precursor for PT ... rule substation question on pt 57 was on the easiest ...
... would fool proof the games 1-35 first, before you begin ... while practicing timed sections from PT1-35. I think doing that ... 's worth at least mastering PT1-35 and having those fool ...
... ; Anyone here who fool proofed PT1-35, about how long did ... ; I haven't done all PT1-35, in fact I'm ... about just doing all the PT1-35 straight-up fool proof ... under time. Before I hit PT'ing hard I want to ...