HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.8K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| q4 | 68 | 73 |
-
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... cookie-cutter days is access 1-2 star questions through the ... has drilling sets from particular PT ranges, something incredibly helpful.)
PT 56. Section 3 Question 10 on that exam ... 12 days ago I reviewed PT 37 Section 2 Question 19, is ... -
Setting up double layer sequencing games.Hi guys, Im having trouble setting up this type of game. Not sure where to put what elements, what the elements are and what the base is. Does anyone…
... just make 2 lines and 1 line will be for the ... about them and on line 1 you can put the 4 ... helpful!
For example PT 66 section 3 game 4. That throws me ... -
LR 4/5 Difficulty Q's - more speed and accuracy?Any advice on how to get better at LR 4/5 star difficulty Q's? I'm like -7 for LR (both sections) and almost all of the 7 wrong are all level 4/5 que…
... can get to -0 or -1 in LR and get these ... /> Thanks for following up. PT 23, Section 3, #25 - this is one example ... -
How long did it take you to fool proof the LG pack, tests 1-35?I am just trying to get an idea, how many games should someone do a day?
... did exactly one new test section of games or 4 games ... 1: PT 1, -------------, -------------
Day 2: PT 2, PT 1, -------------
Day 3: PT 3, PT 2, -------------
Day 4: PT ... -
In need of help with this exampleI would say I am at the point where indicators and making diagrams has become second nature for me. But, this particular problem has my mind going in…
... />
Apply 'unless' as group 3, negate sufficient.
G ... covered in the CC: PT 32, Section 3, Game 1. There's a couple ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... gist.
1) Attacking the source of the ... br /> 6) Circular Reasoning (PT17, Section 2, Q2; PT17, S2, Q20 ...
16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
17 ... Confusing part v. whole (PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also describe ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... .
>
> 1) Attacking the source of the ... > 6) Circular Reasoning (PT17, Section 2, Q2; PT17, S2, Q20 ... > 16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
>
PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also describe ... -
Help with Identifying Assumptions and Prephrasing in generalSo, as a person that does not make assumptions in the real world (aka: I ask and double check EVERYTHING) WEAKENING & STRENGTHENING Qs are killing …
> @"sunkim49424-1" said:
> Does anyone ... to
>
> 1. Find the Assumption
> ... />
Take, for example, PT 15 Section 3 Number 23. There is absolutely ... -
Weakness on NA/SA/weakening/flaw sectionsThese are all my incorrect questions that pop up the most as wrong answers. What can I do to fix weaknesses on these types of questions?
... question. Take a look at PT 40-Section 3 Question 5. Here are ... myself for this question:
1.What is/are the premise ... .What is the conclusion:
3.Does this question contain some ... type of assumption please see: PT 62-4-23.
⚖ Official October 2020 LSAT-Flex Discussion Thread ⚖Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official October 2020 LSAT-Flex Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the Octob…
... is disappointing bc I PT -1 to -3 in that section, that was the ...How Much Higher Can I Expect to Score?Hey guys, I recently finished most of the core curriculum (I didn't finish the grouping games nor start the RC because I got burnt out and was re…
... more or less correct that 1-2 PT a week is more ... ’d do a complete LG section, starting with PT1 and just ... . Maybe skip every other one (PT 1, then 3, then 5) or even ...Is it worth studying LR questions from PT 1-35?I found many Level 5 questions from PT 1-35 not only difficult but annoyingly silly. Also, looks like many do not even have an explanation video on …
... (I.e., PT 1-63), starting from PT 1 (Currently on PT 5). I strongly ... completed Prep tests (I.e., PT 1 through 63). So, I have ... 9/25 on the first section of LR. However, yesterday, I ... I consistently scored -1 to -3 on PT 1, 2, 3, and 4 thus far ...Logic Chain (ish) questionHello, I've got a common question about linking up a logic chain. I just re-watched the video lesson but it's not precisely the answer to my questio…
... /> My question is from PT 47 section 3, number 21. According to the ...Confusing necessary and sufficient conditionsHello all, I believe I understand the concept of sufficient and necessary conditions and their relationship, however, I am confused when in a flaw qu…
... looks like. For example, in PT 64, section 3, question 11 - one of ...Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... practice tests (PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" and PT 3 Section 2 #3 "In Europe ... .
For #3 from PT 3 section 2, I was between answer ...PT 41, Section 3, Question 3I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR. BUT, I watched the video and I reasone…
I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR.
BUT, I watched the video and I reasoned it differently.
We're taught that, if we're given a premise, we have to take it to be true, ...Science Experiments in LR QuestionsPowerscore claims that recently PTs have had a lot more science experiment questions in LR. I've obviously taken a bunch of science classes and know …
... />
For example, on PT 71 Section 3 #4, E is the right ...PT 23 Section 3 Question 12Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like …
Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like it's a flaw because it goes from health food enthusiasts to saying in general, those who take XYZ will ...PT 73 Section 3 Game 2Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z? For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X c…
Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z?
For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X can go before Z as long as Y goes after Z. I am having trouble with my fundamentals, please help, ...Mapping Logical Reasoning: Do we have a set of questions available?Hi Everyone! I've been doing a lot of work recently with memorizing valid inferences that can be made from conditional and inter-sectional statem…
... set of questions similar to PT 43, Section 3, Question 9, beginning "Most ...Abstract language.I have an issue with the harder flaw reasoning questions. 99 times out of 100 i can point out the flaw. Hell i can make a stand up comedy routine abo…
... abstract language down. (random example. PT 41 section 3 question 20)
PT's. sort of just wanted ...Confusion about : "The {person}'s argument proceeds by...."I am a little confused about questions in which a scientist/critic/psychologist/whatever will state their opinion on something, often giving context …
... this is Question 20 from PT 68 section 3. I missed this question ...Confusing grammar in this sentenceFrom prep test 1, section 3, question 20, in the middle it states "However, most people consistently perceive small business as a force for good in s…
From prep test 1, section 3, question 20, in the middle ...Possible Substitution Equivalency StrategyHi. Im studying for the June LSAT and (like most people) am having trouble with SE questions. While watching on of JY's game explanation videos for P…
... 's game explanation videos for PT 66 and noticing some differences ... to this in this case (PT 66, section 3, Q11). However, upon my ...Distorting Argument - Flaw Answer ChoiceCan someone provide me with an example of what "distorts an argument against X, and then attacks this distorted argument" would look like? PT C2, …
Can someone provide me with an example of what "distorts an argument against X, and then attacks this distorted argument" would look like?
PT C2, Section #3, Question #6 Answer Choice DPrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 18I'm having a hard time understanding the correct answer choice here as it seems to directly contradict the passage, which states that the amount of d…
I'm having a hard time understanding the correct answer choice here as it seems to directly contradict the passage, which states that the amount of domestic oil reserves considered extractable has not changed in ten years. The correct answer E would indeed ...PrepTest 1 Section 3 Question 11#help Can someone explain why B is the correct answer choice? ("The concentration of oxygen-18 in seawater is increased")
#help
Can someone explain why B is the correct answer choice? ("The concentration of oxygen-18 in seawater is increased")Trouble with Science RC passages?Check out JY’s explanation breaking down the passage for PT 42, Section 3, Passage 4. He shows how crucial it is to be able to visualize. It is a gre…
Check out JY’s explanation breaking down the passage for PT 42, Section 3, Passage 4. He shows how crucial it is to be able to visualize. It is a great passage to hit hard for review!Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... why A is incorrect. For PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" my ..."A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... is highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D ...
