HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.8K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
| q4 | 68 | 73 |
-
Need advice - PT vs. individual timed sectionsHi everyone, I have been at the stage where I have consistently been going -1 to -3 on untimed LR and RC for a while. Now, I have decided to start…
... have consistently been going -1 to -3 on untimed LR and RC ... of the week doing a PT? I have read on this ... you would from a full PT by taking the test as ... ON TOP of doing a PT. Depending on where you are ... improved since you're last PT, it's probably more productive ... -
For the people getting -0 in LGFor those getting -0 in LG, would you have any advice for strategies during timed conditions? How did you finally make it to -0 in the whole section?…
... (i.e. game 4, 3, 2, 1) that way the inferences I ... -- I go through the whole section (1, 2, 3, 4) making sure to ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... remember which pertained to which section -.-
> > >
section, right before break
1, 4, 3 -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... remember which pertained to which section -.-
> > > > ... LR I mean = the 3rd section, right before break
> ... hardest. From hardest to easiest: 1, 4, 3
Is it ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... remember which pertained to which section -.-
> > > > ... LR I mean = the 3rd section, right before break
> ... hardest. From hardest to easiest: 1, 4, 3
>
> ... -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... 3 LR sections was experimental. The only question I remember the section ... end of my second LR section (section 3) with 26 questions. I ... /> > @"lsatstudent-1" said:
> Was the LR section with a ... experimental or real? (Second LR section for me.) -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
> @"lsatstudent-1" said:
> I still ... end of my second LR section (section 3) with 26 questions. I think ... ; @"lsatstudent-1" said:
> > Was the LR section with a ... experimental or real? (Second LR section for me.)
>
During foolproofing, when did you start getting better?So, I'm foolproofing LG and I am doing it by difficulty. So, I'm starting with simple ordering and am almost finished with that section. I feel like …
... assume it is test 57 section 1 game 3 from the comment. That ...Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-1-game-3/
I think ... stimulus of PT23.S1.Game 3, you think this is an ... game with three groups (Team 1 with three people, Team 2 ...FoolproofDoes it matter what pt is use to foolproof and timed full test and sections ? I did pt36 as my first set of games to foolproof and I got 3 games out…
... /> > Does it matter what pt is use to foolproof and ... to foolproof and I got 3 games out of 4 down ... to use the early tests (1-35) to fool proof when ... highly recommend just starting from PT 1 and continue fool proofing.
Kaplan/Barron's/test prep books without real LSAT questions for startingI've heard form multiple sources that reccommend that I only buy books that use real LSAT questions (unlike Kaplan, Barro's, etc) I have over a ye…
... 10000019
Section 1 (Games): 12 correct, 11 incorrect
Section 2 (Arguments ... 13 correct, 11 incorrect, 1 blank
Section 3 (Arguments): 9 correct, 16 ... incorrect
Section 4 (Reading ...Kaplan/Barron's/test prep books without real LSAT questions for startingI've heard form multiple sources that reccommend that I only buy books that use real LSAT questions (unlike Kaplan, Barro's, etc) I have over a ye…
... ; @10000019
>
> Section 1 (Games): 12 correct, 11 incorrect ... ): 13 correct, 11 incorrect, 1 blank
> Section 3 (Arguments): 9 correct ... , 16 incorrect
> Section 4 (Reading ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... had S1LR25/S3LR25/S4LR26 Section 1 WAS real not Section 3 just like those ... should have known the one section I knew I destroyed was ...Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. <b>Please keep all discussions of the December 2017 LSAT here!</b> Here's some grou…
... had S1LR25/S3LR25/S4LR26 Section 1 WAS real not Section 3 just like those ... should have known the one section I knew I destroyed was ...Personal Study Buddy RequestHello, I'm probably taking the LSAT again in June. I did a lot better than last time (13 point increase thanks to 7sage) but my score still sucks…
... help you out.
#1- Go outside for a bit ... having to do one PT a week
#3- Be honest about ...FoolProofing help neededIs there a minimum amount of sections needed to “foolproof?” My type A is kicking in and I’m considerig fullproofing 50 plus logic sections. But is t…
... . Are there particular games, like pt 1-35 that are best to ... /> People foolproof 1-35 because those are the same section the core ...Diagnostic 142; BR 148. PT36 after CC a 146; BR 148.Decent improvement? Is there hope? Or is this too terrible for any hope? Ha. Wasn't much of a jump. Although I am glad it went up rather than dow…
... do on the games from PT 36? It contains in my ... or aisle seats, in rows 1,2,3?New Tests vs. Older TestsI know most thoughts are to use the most recent tests for PT's. But why is this? I know they got rid of the question type where you read a passage …
... noted:
-recent tests (last 3-4 years) have LG that ... the good old days of PT 1-35
-recent tests' RC ...Does it mean..?Hi this may sound like a silly question but I want to make sure- I still haven't gotten my score back due to waiver appeal, but I see on other forums…
... the real LR was sections 1 and 3. On my December test ... , I believe they were sections 1,3 and 5 if i remember ... didn't feel good about section 1, does that mean for sure ... it was the real section and not experimental or could ...PT4.S3.G1 - a law firm has exactly nine partnersI missed question 4. I actually couldn’t pick an answer because they all appeared to work as I moved my l–n block around for each answer choice. I re…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-4-section-3-game-1/For Re-TakersHey all! I took Sept 17, and got a decent score. Not the score I want or need. But the dilemma begins: how do you shake the "where do I go from here…
... do is to take a PT. You need to evaluate where ... proof 2 games and do 1 section of LR w/ blind review ...Foolproof Tracking/Organization MethodAnyone have any suggestions as to the best way of tracking foolproofing? Just starting out, but want a system in place before I do. I don't want t…
... spreadsheet to track foolproofing for PT 1-35, and user Not Ralph ... 've added columns for section time and section incorrect total. I like ... to foolproof an entire section at a time, and it ... for average number missed per section.QBankHi all, is there a way to print out questions from the QBbank? I would like to start drilling LR questions and find it easier to do them on actual pa…
You can print out the drills at the end of each section in the CC. That way you’ll have questions by type from Pt 1-35 if I recall. That’s what I did!For those who used 7sage CC to study and got a 170+ on your PTs/the LSAT, how did you approach CC?Did you not continue on in the CC until you mastered the section? I'm going back through the CC again after not taking it seriously last year. …
... about as I pacifico foolproofed PT 1-25 (leaving some for after ... other's advice on the section or restrict myself to logic ...Complaint/Critique: Inconsistent LG approachesThere are some situations where JY takes a different approach to a rule for no ostensible reason other than the fact that the ordinary approach would…
... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-3-game-2/), if you ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-3-game-2/), I tell ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-3-game-2/) (which free ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-73-section-3-game-1/), it's a close ...[Student Question] Grouping GamesHey 7Sagers, had a student email me with a question that I thought you could help with. Here it is: ----------------------------------- I seem …
... In Group. For example: PT 17 Game 4 (Don't ... a funnel cake).
Example: PT 14 Game 4
< ... that are weird amalgams. PT 29 Game 2 is kinda ... component.
Example: PT 25 Game 3 (I love this game ... skill. So drill by section once you've nailed down ...How much harder has RC become in the later tests?Hey all, Another RC topic here. I've only been drilling from early PT's, PT 35 being the latest. I've only taken full timed PTs from the 30s and …
... in PT 52, I actually think RC is the least changed section ... are the same as from PT 1. The ACs can hinge on ...February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
Question about LR experimental sections:
Are real questions mixed with fake questions throughout the 3 LR sections?
Or is it the case that if you get 3 LR sections-2 sections are ENTIRELY real and 1 section is ENTIRELY not real?February LSAT Discussion ThreadIs there an official thread for this? I need a distraction (or destruction) <b>Admin note: edited title</b>
... with fake questions throughout the 3 LR sections?
> Or ... get 3 LR sections-2 sections are ENTIRELY real and 1 section is ... ENTIRELY not real?
2 are entirely real, 1 ...Feb Test Logic GamesI normally crush the LG section and I found it really hard. I couldn't get past a few inconsistencies (obviously on my end). But I would like to kn…
... (LG in 1 and then LG in 3). Well...the ... br /> When I turned to section 3 and saw that it was ... assumed that the first section was probably the experimental. ... from the LG section I took in section 1 that I couldn ... to you guys) that the section 3 (for me) was the ...
