A condition stated is "Within each segment, reports are ordered by length, from longest to shortest." For purposes of my question I'd like to emphasize that this condition, like all LG rules, is an absolute rule that must be followed.
Can someone diagram the logic of this question? I don't see where the latter part of answer choice A can be inferred from the stimulus?.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-54-section-4-question-09/
... , lol). Section one went somewhat well, section 2 went ... I tanked section 3 (which was the experimental...woohoo!), section4 went ... "okay," and, section 5 (LG)... ... graduated with highest honors (4.0 LSDAS GPA) from ...
After watching video, I understand why A is true. Yet, I still confuse about (D). Is it not a flaw?
The link is here https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-14/
I'm confused why the arrow splits for PT 22 GAME 4 RULE 4 and the arrow doesn't split for PT 31 GAME 2 RULE 4 even though they both contain the words NEITHER NOR.
I thought the arrow can't be split for NEITHER NOR statements.
In PT 77, Section 2, Questions 5 and 14 they both use the word "linked" in their arguments. When the LSAT uses the word "linked," does it only mean correlation?