I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks
... that we are going through PT17-35 to extract the questions ... loose selection of questions from PT 10-35 making up the ... pretty much every question from PT17-35 (way more questions than ...
@"Cant Get Right" thank you for clarifying that to me. Also, if I am, for example, weak in NA, should I go print out questions from PT17-36 and do them, watch explanations and try to understand? Or how should I drill them?
PT 9 S3 Game 3 - The School dance game. The sort of game that I would have lost my shit on had it been on the real deal, but taking the time to split the game boards and make all necessary inferences makes the questions a breeze
PT17.3.4
Yes! This ... sure if the question below (PT17. 3. 4) showcases "how the ... question from rather an old PT, but I think the skill ... was definitely a good early PT question to look at for ... , we just finished review of PT 73 and those point at ...
@goingfor99th PT 33 S3 Q18 AC, E. It could be wrong for other reasons. But in the LSAT TRAINER he says that saying what we ought to do is a different conclusion
... , and I am starting with PT 1 to make sure that ... of Section 3 (LR) of PT 1; however, in the 'LSAT ... explanations aren't present until PT17 and beyond.
>