I feel silly for getting this two star flaw question wrong in timed and in BR lol. I actually pre-phrased both answers which is why I found this one so difficult.
When I read the stimulus the first issue I noted was that we have no context ...
... accident, that PT 26 S1 Game 2 and PT 81 S4 Game 2 ... because I had randomly done PT 26 S1 game 2 as ... a warmup LG before taking PT 81 today. They did ask ...
For example, in PT 93, JY explains that the ... other in/out games. In PT 61, I tried applying the ... a conditional relationship similar to PT 93 is only when there ...
I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks
For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14 ... problem across several PT's. For example, see PT 127, Section 2 ... evaluating answer choice D in PT19 Section 2 Question 18. < ... br />
@dcdcdcdcdc said:
A is wrong because it could be that her daughter is just very wise at birth. Isn't this the same as saying a tree could just start off with a lot of rings?
@"steve-10" said:
The correct answer to Q1, the typical "acceptable configuration" question, implies T — W (where "—" is the usual notation indicating relative order).
Well, it does imply that T -- W is a possibility. T -- W ...