PT --> E
B some ... JY used 100 for both PT and B. That adds up ... switched the numbers for PT and B to 50 and ... 100 is 40, then 50 PT + some B (40) = ...
... last pretest - hopefully ever (PT-73) and notwithstanding the fact ... bombed a Logic Games section and --for me in ... to be the first section so it was literally ... Going back to today's pt, it was a total ... sections of reading comp. Section4 was games, which made ...
... test, so I just took PT 52 (it's the lowest ... guessed correctly on 2 of 4Q's
BRed a ... get anywhere from 15-25 PT's in between I would ... question boils down to 25 PT's with thoroughly BRed and ... basically nothing else or 15 PT's with drills in between ...
... regarding LSAT 46, game 3, section4, question 12. The game ask ... for N = 2. With L = 4, that places L immediately next ... ; L = 1, 2, 4; N =1,2, 4, and O = 1,2 ... ,4,5
... questions are from PT 36 SECTION 1 #18 and PT 63 SECTION 1 #10. I ... 'm having trouble understanding why for PT ... conclusion is correct but for PT 63 an answer choice (D ...
... the numbers using data from PT 58 through current. Results:
D 201 20.70%
E 181 18.64%
Total ... 47 20.61%
B 47 20.61%
C 46 20.18%
D 46 20.18%
E 42 18 ...
... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-68-section-4-game-4/
I have a ... CAN be earlier than Q only if Q is third." I ... S IS earlier than Q only if Q is third" so I ... . to be earlier than Q or if we take the ... contrapositive of the rule, when Q is not third, we ...
... saying that if P --> Q does not preclude the possibility ... of R --> Q. Is this statement necessarily pointing ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-53-section-1-question-18/
... Looking at the explanation of question 20 ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-3-question-22/ ... com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-3-question-20/