HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 33 | 450 | 517 |
| s | 69.2K | 125.1K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.8K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 20 | 4.4K | 5.4K |
-
PT63.S1.Q10 - ms. sandstrom's newspaper columnHi all, Blind reviewing the aforementioned Prep Test and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never have these kinds of very basic questio…
... Test and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never ... this problem sneaky.
1) "Thus, Ms. Sandstrom should pay ... people to damage the Mendel's farm."
Is this ... : I've already watched JY's explanation videos but would appreciate ... -
PT52.S1.Q24 - in response to several bacterial infectionsI know answer choice B is not supported but I can't explain to myself WHY it's wrong. Is it wrong because the terms "apple" and "citrus" should be…
@lllllllll said:
Because McElligott's citrus juices HAVE NOT BEEN ... less infectious bacteria than M'S apple juice?
No ... of people sick, and it's just that nobody has realize ... it's this juice that's making everybody sick ... -
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSSpt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS Hi Everyone, I was stuck on this question, and I was wondering if someone can take a look at my breakdown of this question to…
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS
1-question-21/
< ... /> This is incorrect because q stem doesn't state that ... effect remains strong if it's well coordinated.
< ... confused because of it's wording... what are ... -
Where to buy Logic Games from PT's 1-35Where is the best place to buy Logic Games from PT's 1-35?
Where is the best place to buy Logic Games from PT's 1-35? -
In case anyone wanted to know which LG from PT 1-35 are taught in CC...PT 1: Game 3 PT 2: Game 4 PT 3: Game 2 PT 4: Game 2 PT 5: PT 6: PT 7: PT 8: PT 9: Game 2 PT 10: PT 11: PT 12: Game 3 PT 13: PT 14: PT …
...
PT 5:
PT 6:
PT 7:
PT 8:
PT 9 ...
PT 13:
PT 14:
PT 15:
PT 16: Game 1, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 20: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 33: Game 1, Game 2, Game 3, Game ... -
[Free LR Tutoring] - PT86.1.Q-Evens Tuesday 9pm CST.What's up 7Sagers, it's your cringe-master, **S**trong-**I**ndependent-**M**an-of-**P**assion, i-think-the-lsat-is-a-cunt, _lsat_sus._ Do you ever…
What's up 7Sagers, it's your cringe-master, **S**trong-**I**ndependent-**M ... LR tutoring session on PT 86 Section 1 EVENS. **Try to have ... our sessions (imo).
1. Goals - prove to you why ... note whether or not the Q yielded a predictable pre-phrase ... -
Help with PT.33.S4.Q12 (G2) - Bird-watchers explores a forestGood Evening, Everyone. Can someone please share some knowledge with me revolving around question 12 of PT.33? My specific question pertains to un…
... revolving around question 12 of PT.33? My specific question pertains ... />
The lawgic is /S --> J --> H --> ... title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the ... **https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-4-game-2/** -
June Test-Takers, Week of Dec. 28th: Tues (PT 33), Sat ( PT 34)<img src="http://mittromneycentral.com/uploads/june-3.jpg"> </center> June Test Takers! We’ve got over 5 months, so let’s make them count by gett…
... down!
Here’s the schedule this week:
PT 33
Click here to join ... in the comments which group(s) you’re planning on ... that link.
Here’s an FAQ on GoToMeeting.com ... ... "No guys, really, it's D, I checked it.” Use ... -
How to properly analyze the relationship between the Premises and Conclusions w. Conditionals?!LR Question Referring To: PT#J07 S#3 Q#17 (Exercising muscles in one back...) Hey all! Hope all is well, I just have a question about how to prop…
LR Question Referring To: PT#J07 S#3 Q#17 (Exercising muscles in one ... ://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/9561/pt-june-2007-s3-q17-when ... , what defines Proper Alignment, would 1% of a Improper Alignment be ... -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What to do to prepare:
Complete PT ... 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark ... -
Tonight RC review pt 63 passages 1/2Hey guys, If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews da…
Hey guys,
If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews daily. Please message if you'd like the link.
Madison -
PT33.S1.Q20 - Recently discovered prehistoric rock paintings...To attack the premise or not to attack the premise I keep hearing over and over again that I'm not supposed to attack the premise but this questio…
... attack that premise since it's saying maybe not?
33-section-1-question-20/ -
PT33.S1.Q20 - I thought we weren't allowed to attack the premises for strengthen/weaken questionsSo this particular question has about 8 years worth of comments and about as much time's worth of confusion regarding why D weakens the argument beca…
... and about as much time's worth of confusion regarding why ... :** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-1-question-20/ -
NA question typesI was wondering if anyone has found a way that works best to approach these question types? If so, PLEASE share.
... now, I’m BR-ing PT 36 s.1. #20 (been staring and thinking ... -
PT48.S4.Q26 - Researcher: It is commonly believedThis is a weakening question, I wouldn't call it a curve breaker question but it definitely gave me some trouble. I know why (B) the credited res…
... choice "C" is that it's not actually saying that non ... the Polar Bear question. PT 32 Sec 1 Q.12. In that stimulus ... -
Main Point of Argument vs. Main Point of Conclusion questions@"J.Y. Ping" or others that have an answer: How do you know, in LR questions where some Q stems require us to identify the main point of the "Argu…
... I am talking about on PT 34, sect 2 Q18
PT 29 Sec 1 Q 11) are these QS's synonymous?
s, am I to interpret them ... paraphrased conclusion among the AC's?
Thanks to you both ... -
How to properly analyze the relationship between the Premises and Conclusions w. Conditionals?!LR Question Referring To: PT#J07 S#3 Q#17 (Exercising muscles in one back...) Hey all! Hope all is well, I just have a question about how to prop…
... LR Question Referring To: PT#J07 S#3 Q#17 (Exercising muscles in ... .com/discussion/#/discussion/9561/pt-june-2007-s3-q17- ... argument works.
Argument#1:
> Premises
... remember that chain for argument #1:
**Maintaining a ... -
General Logical Indicator QuestionThis might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT que…
... LSAT question? For instance pt 27 st 1 q 17, I started reading ... -
PT10.S1.Q18 - People cannot be morally responsible for thingsI been drilling the question types. Right now I am at MSS/MBT. However, I came across an error that was reoccuring with me in logic. What do you do w…
... indicators. For example in PT 10 S.1 People cannot be morally responsible ... -
Some/Most (Relative) relationshipsHi everyone, I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships. Good example of this would be P…
Hi everyone,
I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships.
Good example of this would be PT 33, Sec 3, Q 8. -
PT22.S2.Q07 - newsletter for community-center volunteerscan someone please go through this with me? http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-07/
... help you out with pt 22 s 2 q. 7
So ... has the author done? She’s concluded a causation from a ... well-being . What if it’s a mere coincidence? What if ... -
Will the LSAT ever mention multiple flaws that could be true?Hello, Would the LSAT ever use the same flaw type that has subcategories in the same question? For example, would it ever have multiple answer choic…
PT 33 Sec 1 Q22 is a flaw - except question(each of the following accurately describes a flaw in the lawyers reasoning displayed above except).
I guess this would be an example of multiple flaws in a question. -
Idea/Request for the site.Is there anyway we can add a grader to the problem set sections? This way after the course is completed I can view my overall percentage of where I m…
... sheet. Label one row PT X, S X, Q X (test, section, question ... -
PT10.S4.Q21 - the proper way to plan a scientific projectI really don't like the way answer choice (E) is worded. It's too ambiguous and abstract that I was not able to wrap my head around it during timed c…
... lead to the endeavor's abandonment.
That's how I chose ... -
Mistaking sufficiency for necessity vs mistaking necessity for sufficiencyI'm a bit confused about the technical differences between the errors of (1) mistaking sufficiency or necessity and (2) mistaking necessity for suffi…
... . That question is: Pt 51 Section 1 Question 20. That is the only ... to do beyond or BR PT 56.
In my ... -
Genetic twin example?Hi! I know JY has mentioned games having genetic twins and that’s why we’re doing the fool proof method. I’m currently a quarter of the way through F…
... . Take for instance pt 33 game 1 and pt 38 game 1. In addition to ... -
Genetic twin example?Hi! I know JY has mentioned games having genetic twins and that’s why we’re doing the fool proof method. I’m currently a quarter of the way through F…
... . Take for instance pt 33 game 1 and pt 38 game 1. In addition to ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25 ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
>
& ... -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25 ... -
Delete.Delete.
... give you more context, pt. 68 s.2 q.24's stimulus claims:
