We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...
Interesting. You're positive the NA isn't actually necessary? I'm curious about these examples. I didn't look closely at it, but PT 71.S1.Q11 seems to be about pollution. Is that the right reference? PT means PrepTest, right?
... , 2016 June LSAT BR Group PT40
Tues Jan 26, ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 74
Sat Feb ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 49
Thurs Feb ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 75
Sat Apr ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 68
Sat Apr ...
The stimulus doesn't allow us to conclude this. Grass clippings are one way to get micro-nutrients, but the stimulus doesn't say it's the ONLY way. Thus, when the ...
... , the circle game from PT 1, the Zendu radar ... faced with newer games. PT 77 Game 3 is a ... similar relationship between PT 6 Game 4 and PT40 Game 3. ... There is a closer relationship between PT ... 1 Game 1 and PT 41 Game ...
PT 77 Game 3: historical precursor ... PT 34 Game 2 (the ... is the same.) Pt 72 Game 4: historical ... precursor PT C Game 4 PT 79 Game ... historical precursor PT 6 Game 4 and PT40 Game 3
PT 77 game 3 PT 79 game 4 ... 4 PT 70 game 3 PT 1 circle game ... PT 41 game 4 PT B circle game ... br />
PT 15 game 2 PT40 game 3 PT 29 game ... 2 PT 33 ...
... it.
>
> PT B circle game
> ... 4
> PT Game 4
> PT 6 Game 3 ... br />
> PT 10 Game 3
> PT 11 Game 4 ... br />
> PT 33 Game 3
> PT40 Game 3
> PT 41 Game 4 ...
... would use old sections of PT's you have already done ... 5th section to your new PT, I would say go ahead ... of the sections from a PT you have not done. PT rather than trying to do ... you start from PT 55 and you never do PT40-55, I ...