I am showing that PT 20 LR sections are questions 1 and 4.
Is this one about Marianne and chess players or Tom and employers? I only did a quick search of which problem it is before I dig through my packets and find it.
@sweetsana_27 If you mention the PT #, Section (LR 1 or LR 2), and Question ... better understand the question. Also, LR 1 refers to the first ... section that appears in the PT and LR 2 refers to the ...
... of your time and a PT. For LR do drills where your ... recognizing the flaw in every LR question. The Trainer has some ... . I would not take a PT again until you had these ...
... , 2016 June LSAT BR Group PT 40
Tues Jan ... , 2016 June LSAT BR Group PT42
Tues Feb 2, ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 74
Sat Feb ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 49
Thurs Feb ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 68
Sat Apr ...
They're not above confusing/misleading question stems though. I found PT 78 LR to be really tricky on this. In review, there were several questions where I realized that I'd functionally misidentified question stems.
... were controlled for during your PT: you didn't have a ... review the CC and review PT42 thoroughly before continuing to more ... you possibly can from that PT for your journey forward. Really ...
Hey, everyone! I'll be going over PT42 Passage 2 for my webinar. There's no need to check it out beforehand, but doing so can serve as a nice comparison.
- Review/go through latest prep test video explanations
- Go through 3 sections of a game via Pacifco method
- Go through trainer's RC
- PT42
- Review necessary assumptions
... how to improve my actual PT score from here. I am ... games. Break down on missed PT -16 LR -8LG -14 RC, BR ... -10 LR -0LG -3RC. I misread a ... and really tried to improve LR. The first step to improving ...
... logic_** sufficient assumption questions: see PT 49-2-7.
If ... **. I'm thinking here of PT42-2-23. Here understanding conditional ... of the argument. See here: PT 44-2-13.