I second @"Nilesh S"
I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1 Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright.
I'm talking about the Misc Category from 7Sage for example PT 40 S1 Q10, Q15. I see now that I can just figure out the type myself. Like Q10 is something like an Identify the Disagreement type.
@jac376 said:
Flaw: The correlation of Ra, C, and (C --> Rh) does not mean there is a causation from C to Ra. The answer which strengthens this argument will show that (Rh --> Ra) (C causes Ra because it causes Rh which causes Ra) or directly ...
We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...
Interesting. You're positive the NA isn't actually necessary? I'm curious about these examples. I didn't look closely at it, but PT 71.S1.Q11 seems to be about pollution. Is that the right reference? PT means PrepTest, right?
... , 2016 June LSAT BR Group PT 40
Tues Jan ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT47
Thurs, Feb 18, ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 74
Sat Feb ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 49
Thurs Feb ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 68
Sat Apr ...
The stimulus doesn't allow us to conclude this. Grass clippings are one way to get micro-nutrients, but the stimulus doesn't say it's the ONLY way. Thus, when the ...
... />
-4 "easy" games: PT C2 (total target time on ... minutes, please see also PT47: total target time about ... -4 really hard games: PT C (total target time ...
-4 Medium difficulty games: PT 48 (total target time: ... more or less equivalent to PT 48's difficulty.
Thank you all for your feedback and for being so encouraging :) As some of you recommend, I'm going to film myself taking PT47 today. I hope that it reveals some useful information!