Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but the correct AC of this question seems to suggest the otherwise. Is this a bad LR question?
I don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companies?
I need help with trying to answer the questions that ask something along the lines of "Which of following could substitute the condition (insert rule here)"? I don't know how to approach these at all.
After reading this stimulus, I thought the author was assuming the dire wolves were trapped in the tar pits while hunting and scavenging. Is that correct? I was confused about the use of language in answer choice D; what does most frequently actually mean? ...
I posted this under the Q-specific help vid, but the discussion forum here seems to get more attention sometimes, so double-posting. Promise to add helpful responses I get to my original discussion for our future LSAT progeny :3< ...
... />
PT50 - 166, PT 36 - 170, PT 70 - 172, PT 86 - 166, PT 71 - 169, PT 87 ... - 163, PT ... reason I took PT 70 immediately after taking PT 36, I thought ... getting 10 points less on PT 69. So am I just ...
So, I understand that the argument is saying that because incidences of the flu were lower during the 6 months of the public health campaign, that means that the campaign was effective.
I chose C - there were fewer large public gatherings ...
... good. i got 178 on PT 46 after BR. I am ... . I am going to do PT50 tomorrow. Someone else in the ... LR and RC from preptest 50 +. This is one of the ... , when are you taking preptest 50, we should BR that test ...
... off the LGs prior to pt50 by type and went through ... up a review of the PT on the lsat subreddit. This ... a day off before a PT. Like literally just sit around ...