... on building consistency. It's hard to address issues once ... you're in the 170's because you're left ... at the end of each PT. You have to look ... your performance from PT to PT. Look at your last 5 PTs. Where ... examples obviously, but it's things like this you need ...
... the video explanation and JY's examples?
> - Should I ... you're getting around 4 or 5 correct per set on the ... for them before reviewing JY's explanations for the problem sets ...
... is a complex game with 4 or 5 boards, I don't ... to answer the question in 5 seconds. At least eliminate 3 ... -4 answers. And this is just ... them out short hand. It's not like the real good ...
... a particularly daunting example: PT 27 Section 4 Question 14. What ... it is of my brother's. What must be true ... $200
My brother's monthly income is $500 s, you could say that ... my brother's monthly income is more ...
... goal is to be at -5 on RC. My best ever ... normally in the -7 to -4 range. Im going to get ... only one LG section between PT 36 to 66 have i ... them right (that damn PT 55 game 4 bus game whooped me ...
... on RC and like 4 or 5 of those missed Qs would ... . I combined this with JY's RC tips and saw an ... have plenty of time (about 4-4:30 per passage). I found ...
... s six section PT's I prefer back to back four section PT's (4 ... section break 4 section) so I ... when during my last PT a group of older ... thought about trying to PT there at the same ... that has hurt my PT average though. I recommen ...
... LR, I think that's where you're finally going ... LR average dropped from -5 per section to -3 ... could consistently go below -4 without skipping a few questions ... be forced to skip maybe 4 or 5 questions.
... />
For RC, I think it's really timing. I usually have ... the third passage (usually level 4 or so) and get like ... fourth passage and miss like -4 or -5.
... ; For RC, I think it's really timing. I usually have ... the third passage (usually level 4 or so) and get like ... fourth passage and miss like -4 or -5.
>
> ...
... but I pick up 4 or 5 every test I wouldn ... most recent fresh take? That's your best benchmark. ... your fundamentals. And that's good. To push into ... on those traps: It's important to recognize that ... changes to "Susan knows it's Monday") or prescriptive language ...
... in reading comp on PT 70 and PT 81 then fk RC ... is this weird entity....it's either easy or hard. Nothing ... with the consensus. Went -4 on PT 81's RC...and didn't ...
... in reading comp on PT 70 and PT 81 then fk RC ... is this weird entity....it's either easy or hard. Nothing ... with the consensus. Went -4 on PT 81's RC...and didn't ...
... a similar pattern in another PT. LSAT's all about that and ... />
In the Red Admiral example, PT (75 Q. 9), you have a ... />
In comparison to the PT 70 question, you have a ... .
Conclusion: Therefore Network's advertisement likely to not attract ...
> @Sami said:
> > @"Cant Get Right" said:
> > Lol, I saw this and was confused until I saw the date. @Sami you are usually the one answering these questions, haha. You only just recently started using a skipping strategy and it ...
... go to my alma mater's library (they just built an ... casual restaurants and my church's student center. I go to ... place (a chain called Taziki's) with great outdoor seating so ... my part-time job) until 4:30-5, so after the lunch ...
I ... 2: Valid Arguments 3 to 5** – deals with different **types** ... **A→B→C**, #4 **A←s→B→C**, #5 **A‑m→B→C ... is _A→C_, #4 is _A←s→C_, and #5 is _A‑m ... the conclusion must be _B←s→C_ because **both** variables clearly ...
... repost here in case it's useful:
>
... 2: Valid Arguments 3 to 5** – deals with different **types** ... **A→B→C**, #4 **A←s→B→C**, #5 **A‑m→B→C ... is _A→C_, #4 is _A←s→C_, and #5 is _A‑m ... the conclusion must be _B←s→C_ because **both** variables ...
... repost here in case it's useful:
> > ... 2: Valid Arguments 3 to 5** – deals with different **types** ... **A→B→C**, #4 **A←s→B→C**, #5 **A‑m→B→C ... is _A→C_, #4 is _A←s→C_, and #5 is _A‑m ... the conclusion must be _B←s→C_ because **both** variables ...
... one of these every 4 or 5 tests, but well worth ... , and for me that's the difference. Without banking ...
In LG it's fairly absolute. When you know ...
In LR it's a little more variable. I ... look at everything. There's just more subtleties to account ...