Regarding PT53 Dec 2007,
is there ... title. Please use the format "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of ... />
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-53-section-1-question-02/
I am showing that PT 20 LR sections are questions 1 and 4.
Is this one about Marianne and chess players or Tom and employers? I only did a quick search of which problem it is before I dig through my packets and find it.
@sweetsana_27 If you mention the PT #, Section (LR 1 or LR 2), and Question ... better understand the question. Also, LR 1 refers to the first ... section that appears in the PT and LR 2 refers to the ...
@nicole.hopkins
I got another 169 on PT53 :)
I changed two answers to an incorrect answer choice, which means I would have gotten a 171. I was so angry lol
... of your time and a PT. For LR do drills where your ... recognizing the flaw in every LR question. The Trainer has some ... . I would not take a PT again until you had these ...
They're not above confusing/misleading question stems though. I found PT 78 LR to be really tricky on this. In review, there were several questions where I realized that I'd functionally misidentified question stems.