I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks
I am showing that PT 20 LR sections are questions 1 and 4.
Is this one about Marianne and chess players or Tom and employers? I only did a quick search of which problem it is before I dig through my packets and find it.
@sweetsana_27 If you mention the PT #, Section (LR 1 or LR 2), and Question ... better understand the question. Also, LR 1 refers to the first ... section that appears in the PT and LR 2 refers to the ...
... said:
Today, i took PT54 and scored 167.
I ... couple days' break from new PT's to let the good ... want to rush into more PT's too quickly so that ...
... of your time and a PT. For LR do drills where your ... recognizing the flaw in every LR question. The Trainer has some ... . I would not take a PT again until you had these ...