HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 21.6K | 36.1K |
| 57 | 293 | 352 |
| section | 23K | 37.7K |
| 2 | 23.3K | 32.9K |
-
PT74.S1.Q16 - debater: as a pedagogical practiceHi folks, I'm struggling with this question in BR. So I figured I'd post my reasoning and see what you all think of it. Debater: Premise 1:Be…
... as the LSAT (See PT 19 Section 2 Question 1 for a throwback ... -
PT76.S2.Q18 - an article claims that many medical patientsCan someone please explain in a real simple way I read the explanation but I just don't get it with these types of questions Thank you in advance …
... this PT although I did unusually worse on the RC section. Might ... 'd actually recommend re-visiting PT 23, Section 2, Question 16. It hinges ... -
Beliefs v. FactsI've only come across this type of flaw a few times, but I'd like to understand the structure behind it. The explanation and example offered in the c…
Just came across an excellent example of this flaw on a really, really valuable question: PT 31 Section 2 question 21. -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... phenomena can be found on PT 49 Section 2 Question 7. I've ... : I'm thinking here of PT 53 Section 1 Question 8. I ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... has drilling sets from particular PT ranges, something incredibly helpful.)
PT.
Because vague ... example: today I took PT 56. Section 3 Question 10 on that ... 12 days ago I reviewed PT 37 Section 2 Question 19, is the ... -
'Even without''even without' does not seem to follow our group 3 indicator rules.... Ella can pass even without giving her presentation Using Group 3 rules I…
... stuck on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such an ... -
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
OK, working on PT 9 - Section 2 - Question 23:
This ... stimulus. The second difficulty was 2) realizing that the missing sufficient ... -
PT41.S2.Q13 (G3) - Each of the seven members of the boardHello, I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from LG 3. Q13 asks for a complete and accurate list of members that could be in the…
... , I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from ... of the members could be...?**" (2)
👉 If the question ... /> The difference between (1) and (2) is subtle but actually pretty ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... /> -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... Necess flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... Necess flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Confusing S for N versus N for SPremise: Resign--->Convicted Conclusion: Convicted--->Resign Would this be confusing N for S or S for N? I thought the two were interchangeable but…
The answer choice says confusing S for N though. That is why I am confused. PT 22, Section 2, #25 -
Using LawgicIve become familiar with the system of translation but Im still struggling to understand the practical use of making the translations. Is it just tha…
... separated from B by exactly 2 spots with A preceding B ... can help us.
2. The second practical use in ... illustration of this please see PT 49 Section 2 Question 7.
PT92.S2.Q21 (G4) - Why wouldn't F's commercial be first?Why isn't "FIGHK" possible? I think the answer should be C instead of E, help, I am loosing it... **Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the form…
I assume this is PT 92 - Section 2 - Game 4? Which question are you referencing?Suppose the condition "" was replaced with Tips?Does anyone have any tips for these questions? I tend to have to work through each answer choice to see if it would have a similar effect to the remo…
... a good example for this (PT 69, Section 2, Game 3, Question 17 ... just cross out 1 or 2 answer choices right off the ...Question about PT's..Hello All, I started the 7sage course in January 2015. I have being doing PT's for 2 weeks now with 2 PT's/week as I work full time. I bought the …
... have being doing PT's for 2 weeks now with 2 PT's/week ... package so I have PT's 36-57. This means that by ... should buy the more recent PT's (60 and on) in ... mean skipping some of the PT's that come with the ...PT 72 Section 3Is section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT 72 is weird and I shouldn't be discouraged by lower scores on this test than the others.…
... section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT ... on the first LR section of this PT but I did horribly ... on section 3. What are your ... experiences with this PT?Superprep 2 PTHas anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?
Has anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?Sliding back from 170s to 160s.... What should I do???Hello everyone, I have always just read discussion postings and never thought about actually asking a question about my own problem.. Think I real…
... for the PT 57 especially!
I got 160 on PT 57 and 168 ... on PT 58. This is ... only -1 or max -2, but for the PTs in ... questions earlier in the LR section fast enough. Timing has ... as I do with dropping PT scores.... could you please ...Feedback on PT schedule for June?Just set up a schedule and would appreciate some feedback. Made sure to take 2-3 tests per week, and on the weeks I take 3 to include one retake to h…
... . Made sure to take 2-3 tests per week, ... /> April 6- PT 40
April 10- PT 55
... /> April 14- PT 45
April 17- PT 73
April ... /> May 1- PT 60
May 3- PT 57
May 5 ... - PT 72 (retake)
...PT 29.S2.P1 - for some years before the outbreak of world war 1https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage Hi everyone - I'm currently working on Reading Comprehension and am work…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage
Hi ... 35, an art passage from PT 29 is dissected.
PT June 2007.S2.Q24 - car companies solicit consumer informationI have been analyzing all the June 2007 (public domain) questions one by one, and find that they all neatly fit into very neat symbolic argument patt…
... symbolic argument patterns--except for Section II Question 24. I would ... if this is a free PT! You can see the question ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-24[Spoiler Alert] LR Issues PT 69 - Section 4There were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers that I could not seem to justify even after BRing, not sure if this type …
... were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers ... seemed as if it presented 2 necessary conditions for the book ... year -
1. important;
2. well written.
I ...Question: Cambridge PT 5th Section (PT-A)?I just found a copy of PT74 I bought from CambridgeLSAT awhile ago. It looks like it's got 5 sections, with the 3rd section labeled as (PT-A) on the …
... sections, with the 3rd section labeled as (PT-A) on the Answer ... to indicate whether this section came from another PT.
Are ...PT 59 - wtf happened to my score???I recently took PT 59. I've been scoring in the low to mid-160s, but this time it dropped to 156. I suppose a 4ish point drop isn't that big of a de…
I recently took PT 59.
I've been ... away)
On Sec 2 (LR), I got 6 answers ... 't perform like this on Section 2. Maybe I was tired especially ... hitting Section 3 (but usually this doesn ...[Ended] PT 79 Blind Review with J.Y. | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, I want to try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 LSAT). Instead of making videos, I will lead BR sessions. (Videos will be …
... try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 ... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... br /> 11/18 Friday - Section 2 - RC
11/19 ... br /> 11/21 Monday - Section 2 - RC
11/22 ... br /> 11/25 Friday - Section 2 - RC
11/26 ...PT 80 Blind Review with J.Y. | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, it was a lot of fun [Blind Reviewing PT 79](https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/9414/ended-pt-79-blind-review-with-j-y-multiple-se…
... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... Session
3/28 Tuesday - Section 2 - RC
7:30p - 10 ... Sessions
3/5 Sunday - Section 1 - LR
3/6 ... /> 3/18 Saturday - Section 4 - LR
3/27 Monday - Section 2 - RCPT 80 Blind Review | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 80 (December 2016 LSAT). I'm holding 9 sessions total. 3 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session wi…
... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... - LR
5/20 Saturday - Section 2 - RC, Passages 1 and 3 ...
5/23 Tuesday - Section 2 - RC, Passages 2 and 4
5 ... /> 5/25 Thursday - Section 4 - LR
5/26 Friday - Section 2 - RCPT 81 BR Sessions with J.Y.Hey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 81 (June 2017 LSAT). I'm holding 12 sessions total. 4 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session will …
... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... Sessions
8/26 Saturday - Section 2 - LR
8/27 ... , Passages 1 and 2
8/29 Tuesday - Section 2 - LR
... /> 9/1 Friday - Section 2 - LR
9/2 Saturday - Section 3 - LR
Abandon Ship?Up until last week, I was feeling really confident. My previous five scores (under strictly timed/bubbled/public conditions): PT 57- 179 (defi…
... bubbled/public conditions):
PT 57- 179 (definitely an outlier)
PT 66- 173
PT 71- 173
PT 77- 176
PT ... brought it up to 177; -2 LR, -2 RC)
For ... unable to finish an LG section in about 10 tests, but ...
