HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 58 | 288 | 337 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.9K |
-
PT28.S1.Q25 - mckinley: a double-blind studyI really don't understand why C can't be an answer. McKinley said the drug will have various effects on the patients' bodies. But he also said it wi…
Full detailed explanation:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-25/ -
Re-reading Game RulesI read an article on LSAT HACKS making the case to re-read the rules 4 times as per the below guidelines: 1] To understand the game. 2] To draw. …
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-1-game-1/
Then if ... -
Problem Set Changes Going Live Tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning)Good news, we finished the problem set changes! The <strong>problem set overhaul is going live tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning) at: 12…
... game designation; it specifies which PT and section, but not which specific ... -
Problem Set Changes Going Live Tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning)Good news, we finished the problem set changes! The <strong>problem set overhaul is going live tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning) at: 12…
... game designation; it specifies which PT and section, but not which specific ... -
Experimental Section QuestionsLet me start by saying I have not taken the LSAT. With that said I have some questions. -Does everyone get the same experimental type? Could john …
... you can obviously tell which section you had an extra of ... thought I did horribly on section 1, instead of letting it get ... -
*Updated* BR Groups, Week of July 22nd: Weds (PT56), Fri (PT72)<b>Update</b>: Just kidding, y'all ... I'll be on all of the calls this week :D <s>Eleven</s> TEN weeks. Four days. And change. That's how long w…
I'll try to do PT 58 this week so I can join in this Wednesday. Approx how long are the sessions? -
In a slump =(I've been really delaying making this thread, partially in hopes that I would start hitting the scores I need to soon, and wouldn't need to basically…
... support guys, guess what? Did PT 58 today and got a 161 ... -
In a slump =(I've been really delaying making this thread, partially in hopes that I would start hitting the scores I need to soon, and wouldn't need to basically…
@bSM45LSAT said:
Did PT 58 today and got a 161. ... -
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Feb 2000 (PTC) G4:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-c-section-1-game-4/
Dec 1994 (PT13) G4:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-13-section-1-game-4/ -
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Oct 91 (PT3) G3:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-2-section-3-game-3/
(Personally hated this one)
Dec 92 (PT18) G4:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-1-game-4/
(Not bad, just weird) -
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-1-game-4/
(Not bad ... -
how to improve on logical reasoningI feel like I am hitting a plateau on the LR section, I keep getting 7 or 8 questions wrong every time I do it. I am starting to feel sick while doin…
... :) Who told you to do PT's untimed? Unless we're ... talking about PT's from 1-36, this is, IMO ... , a HUGE waste of a PT ... -
Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... why A is incorrect. For PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser ... -
Necessary assumption woes.I currently suck at this question type. I mean I do not have a clue on what I am doing even when applying the negation test. what is a good strategy …
Check out this specific NA question. It's a great question and a great explanation by JY.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question-24/ -
Confused about test dayI have not taken an official LSAT in a test center yet so I am confused how it works. When the section you are working on is done then what happe…
... is called for any given section.
After ... answer for a question in Section 1/2 if you're on ... -
Site Maintenance ongoing [Ended]Hey guys, 7Sage is undergoing maintenance and you may notice pages occasionally loading slowly. Since a lot of stuff is going on in the background…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-59-section-1-game-4/ -
December LSAT---Is it too late to apply for upcoming cycle?I've never taken the LSAT yet and I don't believe I'll be hitting my target score come October. I want a 169+ and it's really aggravating since LG is…
... , then I can take PT's from 1-35 to keep my ... skills up on fresh PT's ... ) know there are always more PT's unless you truly have ... -
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
Following up on RC: PT 35, Section 2
My specific questions ... -
Necessary and sufficientI understand that this is probably a dumb question but I keep having difficulties with flaw questions that have answers that "confuse necessary and s…
... when I was working on PT 73 section 4, question 25:
Oct 2015 LR Experimental HelpI have searched around discussion boards online and it does not seem that anyone or any group of people have identified the experimental LR from the …
... same format. The first section had only 1 disagree maybe? I also ... remember an early miscellaneous in section 1. So, to narrow down here ... , do others remember a second section with 3-4 disagree?Jon's ExplanationsI'm not sure if this has been mentioned in an earlier thread, so I apologize if I am repeating it. Jon, would it be possible for you to use a bet…
Jon's October 2008 explanations have some feedback. Explanations are great and we can still hear him. It's just not as clear as it could be: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-06/Significant Drop in Older PT's - Help!So just to give some background I started studying for the October LSAT end of June and was PT-ing around the early160's by the time I wrote the exam…
Just two and I starting PT-ing again 1 week after I wrote October. Maybe it's too early to freak out and just got a little rusty from the week break?Advice for Dec 2015Hi everyone-I consistently practice tested from 158-161 right before the Oct LSAT and somehow drastically bombed to a 152. I am quite upset. However,…
... -75, but not all of 1-34). i was able to ... perfect score for one LR section in preptests 74 and 75 ... getting an almost perfect LG section (-1 in Oct '15 vs. -9 ...DEC 1995, Logic Game 2 (Please help me understand)Hello, I don't understand why, in the setup, the last row has to be occupied by only supervisors. It's 4 free spots and I only have 3 supervisors …
... will be in Q and 1 will be in S (at ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-1-game-2/Will the LSAT ever mention multiple flaws that could be true?Hello, Would the LSAT ever use the same flaw type that has subcategories in the same question? For example, would it ever have multiple answer choic…
PT 33 Sec 1 Q22 is a flaw - except question(each of the following accurately describes a flaw in the lawyers reasoning displayed above except).
I guess this would be an example of multiple flaws in a question.PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
This is not an assumption, it's ...PT 58 and 59Hello all! I recently finished taking PT 58 and 59, and got the same exact score!(feeling slightly bummed) I would love to have a skype/google han…
... group is getting close to 58 & 59! If you're ... -5pm - 8pm FEB Group BR PT 58
Sat Dec 5, 2015 ... ) 5pm - 8pm FEB Group BR PT 59
Source: http://7sage ...58.4.16 Madden: Industrialists address problemsI don't really see how B is supported in the situation nor how D does not. Can someone evaluate my reasoning? The question stem is pretty weird.…
... /> http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-16/
