Ah, alas. I am working on LSAT stuff w/o jet-lag, but didn't get around to doing PT65 (in fact, there are like three PTs that I'm behind on taking). I'll definitely be around in all of the following weeks, though. Good luck and cheers everyone!
... think Han Purple is PT74.S1.Q17(https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat ... -17/ ) and Dioxin is PT45.S1.Q12 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations ...
Hi @JenBrooklyn. Definitely! We are reviewing PT65 tonight at 8pm EST if you have any interest in joining. Otherwise, I will post the test for next Thursday this weekend.
... I focus more on tests 65 onward for December/February? Thanks ... . If you're in your PT phase where you have learned ... the basics, I think using PT65 and on for full PTs ...
Thursday May 31, 2018 and Saturday June 2, 2018 is PT65 ? Just want to double check. Sorry I tried going back to check the dates but unfortunately I can't go that far.
... took the LR sections of PT 60, and only improved my ... I took the sections from PT 30, I got -3 on ... this pretty normal, considering that PT 60 was written so long ... taking the RC section of PT65 and got 11 questions worse ...
... June, 2007 test (I believe PT 35). If you're PTing ... that if my diagnostic was PT 60, I would've done ... on each LR section in PT 30 and -6 on each ... in PT 60. So I literally got ... , I did waayyyy worse on PT65, which I later found out ...
... ).
>
> Okay PT 82. Haven't done it ... -7 on RC for both PT65 and PT 82. And I went ... comparative section. But what made PT 82 especially confusing for me ...
@tekken1225 I believe it was a -16 for a 170. PT 23, I think it was. The only more recent exam that I am aware of that comes close to that is -14 for PT 71 and -14 for PT65.