HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 68 | 348 | 406 |
| sec | 187 | 247 |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 12 | 3.1K | 3.7K |
-
PT48.S4.Q26 - Researcher: It is commonly believedThis is a weakening question, I wouldn't call it a curve breaker question but it definitely gave me some trouble. I know why (B) the credited res…
... . Its saying "Many", so maybe 2 species don't have that ... the Polar Bear question. PT 32 Sec 1 Q.12. In that stimulus you ... -
Negation Help !Some A's are not B's A's -----> not B 's (some) What if I want to negate some A's are not B's? would the negation be .... …
I actually found an excellent example for you!
PT 39 Sec. 2 Q#21 -
Panda's guide to answer all SA, PSA, Strengthen and WeakenHi Guys, I think I have spent a lot of effort in coming this up and I want to share with you my hypothesis to see what you guys think about this …
... regarding SA questions. For example: PT 68, Sec 2 Question 23 was, at the ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
To add to this list - #20 part to whole flaw: PT 62, Sec 2, Q 7. -
Hard LR questions with conditional logicAnyone have any tricky LR problems involving conditional logic that they've encountered and could share? Either individual problems or a list, if you…
PT 61, Sec. 2, Q. 24. Ran into this problem yesterday and made a note to go back to it and try to find questions like it because the conditional logic is unconventional, at least to me. -
Delete.Delete.
... give you more context, pt. 68 s.2 q.24's stimulus claims:
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSSpt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS Hi Everyone, I was stuck on this question, and I was wondering if someone can take a look at my breakdown of this question to…
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS
... />
This is incorrect because q stem doesn't state that ...June'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 68 | Tuesday, April 10th | 7:30 pm ESTJune'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 68 | Tuesday, April 10th | 7:30 pm EST https://media.giphy.com/media/xox9kxPMcM81y/giphy.gif **Thank You …
June'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 68 | Tuesday, April 10th | 7:30 pm EST
https://media.giphy.com/media/xox9kxPMcM81y/giphy.gif
**Thank You Victoria for the gif to support the SG!!- @teamteamvicsterStudy partner (Google hangout/skype) for PT 68 for Tomorrow Wanted!If anyone wants to review PT 68 with me tomorrow (Friday) over google hangout/skype. private message me and we can get started. Logical reasoning, bo…
If anyone wants to review PT 68 with me tomorrow (Friday) over google hangout/skype. private message me and we can get started. Logical reasoning, both sections.PT 68 Logic GamesOk, I just finished PT 68 with a 166. I found the Logic Games to be remarkably easy and I've heard people say that the LG's have been getting easier.…
Ok, I just finished PT 68 with a 166. I found ... easier. I haven't taken 68-72 yet, but I am ...Blind Review Group | PT 68 | Saturday, August 13th | 8pm EST<img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/Mjig38oUrloDC/giphy.gif" /> Eat this, LSAT. <h1>Saturday, August 13th at 8PM ET: PT 68</h1> Click here t…
... , August 13th at 8PM ET: PT 68
Click here to join ... />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ...[Ended] Blind Review Group | PT 68 | Wednesday, November 16 | 7 pm EST<h1>Wednesday, November 16 at 7PM ET: PT 68</h1> Click here to join this conversation: <a href="https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/219480381" targe…
... , November 16 at 7PM ET: PT 68
Click here to join ... />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ...June'17 Weeknight Study Group | RC & LG PT 68 Wed 3/15 @ 7:00pm ESThttps://media.giphy.com/media/kMM3vtBEgSsLu/giphy.gif Thank you for the RC Intensive last week @"Cant Get Right" @"Accounts Playable" @danielznels…
... , March 15th at 7PM ET: PT 68
Click here to join ... />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ...[Ended] June'17 Weekend Study Group | LR fr PT 68| Saturday, March 18th at 5:00pm ESTJoin us as we go over the LR sections in PT 68 <img src="https://media.giphy.com/media/B6Zhc8i1ripJS/giphy.gif" /> <h1>Saturday, March 18th at 5P…
... over the LR sections in PT 68
Saturday, March ... 18th at 5PM ET: PT 68
Click here to ... />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ...New Video for PT 32 Game 2Hey guys, I just posted a [new video for PT 32, Game 2.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK7e4OebIug) It's a difficult in/out game that can be mad…
... a [new video for PT 32, Game 2.](https://www.youtube.com ... posted a [new lesson for PT 2, Game 3.](https://www.youtube ...Main Point of Argument vs. Main Point of Conclusion questions@"J.Y. Ping" or others that have an answer: How do you know, in LR questions where some Q stems require us to identify the main point of the "Argu…
... am talking about on PT 34, sect 2 Q18
The question ... point of the argument? (PT 29 Sec 1 Q 11) are these QS ...Least favorite LR questionThis question really bothers me. I do not understand it. PT 68-part 2, question 21. This is a disagree question about why law firm decided to settle …
... . I do not understand it. PT 68-part 2, question 21. This is ...A confusion between conditional logic and causationHi 7sagers, I just had a confusion cause by PT 68 section 2 question 24. JY's explanation is if Hormone causes Stress, then reducing Hormone can redu…
... had a confusion cause by PT 68 section 2 question 24. JY's ...PT68.S2.Q12 - journalist: a book claiming thathttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-68-section-2-question-12/ I was not sure between B and D... As for D, I thought the word "It fails to addr…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-68-section-2-question-12/
I was not ...PT68.S4.G2 - exactly five witnessesI was watching J.Y explanation for PT 68 Game 2 and he mentions that the stimulus allows for one day to be empty, and later on using the rules he inf…
... watching J.Y explanation for PT 68 Game 2 and he mentions that ...PT77.S2.Q16 - Some people see no harmHi, everyone! I need some help going through questions 16 and 18 of PT 77, Sec 2. <font color=red>Admin edit: Please review the <a href="htt…
... questions 16 and 18 of PT 77, Sec 2.
Admin ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-16/
Conditional RuleHey guys so I have a question regarding logic games and conditional rules. Specifically it is from PT #27, Sec 2, Game #4. For question #22 in the ga…
... rules. Specifically it is from PT #27, Sec 2, Game #4. For question ... next to it in line. 2. Car 1 cannot be orange ...Chunky Question StemIn hindsight I understand why D is correct (PT 3 section 2 Q 9), but I eliminated it because in the STIMULUS the comparison was to the **same amount…
... why D is correct (PT 3 section 2 Q 9), but I eliminated ...Some/Most (Relative) relationshipsHi everyone, I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships. Good example of this would be P…
Hi everyone,
I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships.
Good example of this would be PT 33, Sec 3, Q 8.How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
... />
For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14 ... several PT's. For example, see PT 127, Section 2, Question ... answer. Additionally, see PT 127 Section 1 Question ... PT 19 Section 2 Question 18.
PT 151 Section 2 Question 12 ...How to approach "most logically completes" LR questionsDoes anyone have a specific strategy for these? They seem to be cropping up more often, and I usually do it by gut instinct, which is fine with easy …
... having issue with is PT 74, sec 4, Q 7. I didn't ...Still having timing issuesHi all, I am many months into studying for the LSAT and still struggling with timing. A bit about my particular situation: I have gone through…
... phenomena, please see: PT 20-Game 2. Question 12 can be answered by ... what options we try first. PT 11 game 3 question 19 ...Restrictive variables in in-out gamesI’m looking at PT 70’s game 2 right now and I’m trying to understand the intuition behind question 12. “Which one of the following is a pair of emplo…
... to be in: in 70-2 that number would be 4 ...
2.The removal of the necessary ... stated condition.
Question 12: is the second option, we ... -Game 3 Question 19, PT 20 Game 2 question 12
David
