HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 7 | 6K | 7.4K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 16 | 1.3K | 1.6K |
-
For those getting 173/175 +... what's your breakdown per section?For those getting 173/175 +... what's your breakdown per section?
Ike: I missed 7, 10, 16, 17, 23.
Did better on my prep test today, thankfully. I honestly just wish I could walk in and take the test tomorrow. Want to get this over with already haha -
Logical Reasoning: assumption and weaken questionsHi! I'm having some major troubles with assumption and "which will weaken the argument" questions...any tips would REALLY be appreciated at this poin…
... it out—reference to PT/Section/Q is enough for us to ... the material to answer your Q's! :D] ... we don't ... -
Do "Parallel" credited responses not consider "some," "many," "most," et cetera?I've been missing many "Parallel" (both flaw and not) because of, say, a credited response containing "most" while the passage does not. Am I to gene…
@danielznelson Can you give us some specific examples? PT/S/Q# Please. This will help us help you. -
Logic Games Attack StrategySo I've got three weeks left in the Army before I start terminal leave and I've finally reached the end of the learning curriculum and the only thing…
... if you're starting with PT 7 and made all four attempts ... the comment formatting:
PT 7
LG 1
Date ... -
Is there a way to search for specific problems?I know there are keywords for specific problems, but I don't know if theres an easy way to locate them using those keywords. Any info would be greatl…
Well! You can always Google. For instance, "LSAT logical reasoning centaurs unicorns" should help you find all LSAT LR Q's relating to centaurs/unicorns. Then once you know which PT/Section/Q it is, you can look it up here. Happy hunting! -
Timed Section PractiseHi everyone, I am around 3-4 months into my preparation (finished 7sage curriculum and left with half of the trainer), my diagnostic (PT 55) was 150 …
... finishing the curriculum, took the PT 7 days back. While taking the ... PT, I felt that it was ... LR I had around 6-7 questions left when the time ... -
Reevaluating Study Strategy and GoalsSo just bombed my fourth PT and I think it's about time I reevaluate my timeline and goals in here. Mid 160's is my target but I can't seem to see th…
... are concerned, I actually have PT 7- 73 on PDF form. Should ... definitely leaning toward dropping the PT and going straight into fundamentals ... -
LR ExplanationsCan we start a page within our LR discussion category similar to Manhattan's LR explanations page, or do you guys think it's redundant because of the…
... formatting their thread titles with PT#/S#/Q# then it shouldn't ... -
PT9.S1.Q19 - editorial: it is clear that if this country's universitiesCan you guys explain PT 9 section 1 question 19? it reads Editorial: It is clear that if this country's universities were living up to ~~~ I do…
@"mc_meatt" said:
PT 9 section 1 question 19< ... 2 LR sections in that PT- Q#19 does not fit your ... any way to verify the PT, S, Q #'s - we are happy ... -
Logic Games are going to Kill me.I just took PT 36 as the first full test after the curriculum. I haven't done the BR yet and I really don't want to speculate on my score, but I just…
Thanks for the advice and support. I've printed multiple copies of all the games from pt 7-18 for now for drilling practice. It just seems so foreign. I do like Sudoku haha. Too bad it's only a correlation. -
How much improvement did you see on RC?I am getting a little discouraged. I am seeing major improvements in my other sections, but am still doing incredibly bad on RC. Just looking for som…
Are all RC sections good for drilling? @stepharizona - did you drill RC from PT's 1-16? -
Just finished LG Bundle, What to do next for LG?I am aiming for -1 or -2 on LG and I just finished LG Bundle (30 seconds ago) using @Pacifico attack strategy. I kept track of my timing and score …
I feel like I should know this by now, but what *exactly* is the Bundle? I have some of the old PTs (in a 10 Actual LSAC book with PTs 7, 9-16 and 18), and another 10 Actual book of PTs 19-28. Is that adequate? -
PT55.S1.Q25 - some twentieth-century art is greathttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-25/ All of the statements follow logically EXCEPT: A. Some influential art involv…
... Logical Reasoning (LR) questions:
"PT#.S#.Q# (P#) - brief description of ... -
Forum RulesHey guys, we have a really awesome community here that's positive and supportive, thank you for that. I hope these simple rules to regulate this d…
... Reading Comprehension (RC) questions:
"PT#.S#.Q# (P#) - brief description of ... Logic Games (LG) questions:
"PT#.S#.Q# (G#) - brief description of ... -
PT20.S4.Q25 - marianne is a professional chess playerDespite reviewing JY's explanation (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-20-section-4-question-25/), I don't understand why answer choice (C) is …
... /lsat-29-section-1-question-16/] correct answer choice (B)? There ... difference between PT 29.1.16 answer choice B and PT 20.4 ... different.
In PT 29.1.16 the argument form goes ... about living conditions.
PT 20.4.25 has a ... -
Does anyone else think that the recent PT LR Qs punish prephrases?Ok, I might be exaggerating when I say "punish prephrases," but I noticed that the prephrases, especially for the flaw/ assumption type questions, do…
... /= argument weakened).
PT 29. 1.16.
I think I ... -
Using PT's concurrently with Core Curriculum.I've found several similar posts and while valuable, they don't speak to my situation exactly. I'm taking September, I am half way through the Core C…
... should start using some PT's concurrently with my ... curriculum and then start doing PT's? (Schedule says by ... br /> > Mix in PT's either as timed or ... set of 10 that includes PT 7 onward. My understanding is ... to utilize these early PT's concurrently with the ... -
PT7.S1.Q25 - Anti Theft Devices RREI had a lot of trouble with this in drilling and BR. I believe what I was missing is the following: Likelihood of theft Average for theft-prone c…
> @sayhey180 said:
> I tried to look this up, but PT17 is LG and no Q25. Double check if you still want feedback.
Post title says PT 7 -
Pop QuizHey everyone, I recently came across an LSAT stimulus that gave me loads of trouble when I was taking a PT under time. To ingrain the lesson from…
... a similar pattern in another PT. LSAT's all about that ... /> In the Red Admiral example, PT (75 Q. 9), you have a ... />
In comparison to the PT 70 question, you have a ... -
Anyone know where to buy PTs 1-35?Looking for the LGs to foolproof. Figure it'll be a pretty penny or two.
... all the PTs from like PT 7 all the way up to ... -
Anyone know where to buy PTs 1-35?Looking for the LGs to foolproof. Figure it'll be a pretty penny or two.
... all the PTs from like PT 7 all the way up to ... PT 61...
>
> < ... -
Help! Fool Proof Method Days Stacking Issue!So I've been fool proofing post CC. I started out on a schedule of 1 PT a day, drilling each game on day 1, 2, and 7. I'm figuring out that games are…
... &5&1 **Day 7**: PT 7&6&3& ... PT 5 and 6
Day 7: PT 6 and 7
Day 8: PT ... 1, 7 and 8 ... and 13
Day 14: PT 7, 13, and 14
Day ... 7: PT 4, 6, 7
Day 8: PT 5, 7, 8
Day 9: PT ... -
Necessary Assumption Question - are we supposed to throw conditional logic negation out the windowI just want to confirm that when you do the "negation" technique for NA answer choices, you take the common sense version of negation (as in pretty m…
... .Y.'s negation in PT.33.3.16 (B) is the logical ... -
Necessary Assumption Question - are we supposed to throw conditional logic negation out the windowI just want to confirm that when you do the "negation" technique for NA answer choices, you take the common sense version of negation (as in pretty m…
... .Y.'s negation in PT.33.3.16 (B) is the logical ... -
older LR problemsdoes anyone else find that they do worse on LR practice problems from tests before 2001? I find myself struggling with old problems more, particularl…
There are some problems that you wouldn't expect to see in "modern" LSATs (the calendaring question from PT 7 comes to my mind), and some problems are rather unusual. I think that LR questions from June 2007 and onward are more difficult though. -
Is the Starter course enough to get a 160+ in 3 months?If I start the Starter course now, is it enough for the September LSAT for me to get an score of 160+? **Admin note: changed title for clarity**
... I have all the preptest (PT 7 to the latest) do you ... -
Is the Starter course enough to get a 160+ in 3 months?If I start the Starter course now, is it enough for the September LSAT for me to get an score of 160+? **Admin note: changed title for clarity**
... I have all the preptest (PT 7 to the latest) do you ... -
Is the Starter course enough to get a 160+ in 3 months?If I start the Starter course now, is it enough for the September LSAT for me to get an score of 160+? **Admin note: changed title for clarity**
... I have all the preptest (PT 7 to the latest) do you ... 3 months, but could easilly PT with blind review or continue ...
