HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 21.9K | 36.5K |
| 7 | 6K | 7.4K |
| section | 23.2K | 38.1K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.7K |
-
PT 50 Section 4 Q22Help [Mod edit] For reference: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-22/
Help
[Mod edit]
For reference: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-22/ -
PT 69 BR call - UPDATE Section 4 LR Meeting Wednesday, March 24th, at 6pm EST. [Link Posted]All scoring levels welcome. Flex test version. Requirements: - Have taken the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the 2nd LR se…
... the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the ... 2nd LR section will not be ... know!**
**DONE** PT 69 FLEX 3/22/21 ... />
**UPDATE: PT69 section 4 LR (second LR section) BR call - Wednesday, March ... -
[Spoiler Alert] LR Issues PT 69 - Section 4There were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers that I could not seem to justify even after BRing, not sure if this type …
... were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers ... -
Do you get nervous when you put 3 of the same letter in a row?I have always been the type of person to change answers based on a repeating pattern because "there's <b>no way</b> they would put 4 C's in a row, ri…
... no way they would put 4 C's in a row ... practice exams that I wrote (PT 19, Section 4 LR)
15 ... /> There you have it 6/7 answers were C. Let this ... -
difference between Suff. Assumptions vs. Nec. Assumptions that act as a "bridge."Hi everyone, I'm confused about the difference between Sufficient Assumptions vs. Necessary Assumptions that act as a "bridge." I understand th…
... />
As an example, PT 44, Section 4, question 7 is relevant. https://7sage ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question ... -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
Complete PT 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark ... -
June 2007 LSAT Section 4 Question 13Hi there, I am going through my BR of the June 2007 LSAT. I got question 13 of section 4 wrong, so I am trying to understand why B is wrong but E …
... . I got question 13 of section 4 wrong, so I am trying ... -
pt 16 game 4 .. I tried over and over still can't attempt the questions any help?Hey I'm trying to foolproof games 1-35 pacifico style. I stumbled upon pt. 16 game 4. This is the hardest game I've ever seen. I thought PT.12 (game …
... style. I stumbled upon pt. 16 game 4. This is the hardest ... ever seen. I thought PT.12 (game 4?) the flask game was ... me ur reactions to pt 16 game 4, whatever they may be ... -
PT13.S4.Q7 - Murray and JaneIn PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You are wrong to make this claim", does he mean that the claim being made is wrong? It is one thin…
In PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You are ... titled. Please use the format "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of ... -
How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
... 'the #1 response.' PT 138 Section 3 Question 4 also involves this verbiage ... ). For example, see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section 4 Question 18 involves ... in PT 19 Section 2 Question 18.
PT 151 Section 2 ... -
June 2019 BR Study Group- UPDATED!Hi Everyone: Here are the details for this study group! We will be doing a BR Session every Sunday, starting this upcoming Sunday, February 24 fr…
@Alice003 We're doing PT 65, Section 4 this Thursday (3/7/19). Yes, use the same link.
PT 58 is what the March Study Group is doing today. -
June 2019 BR Study Group- UPDATED!Hi Everyone: Here are the details for this study group! We will be doing a BR Session every Sunday, starting this upcoming Sunday, February 24 fr…
> @johnjyoo said:
> Interested!
@johnjyoo Join us! We'll be doing PT 69 section 4 tonight at 7 pm. Just click the link on the original post to join. -
Pt 54 section 4 question 24"Downtown petropolis boasted over 100 large buildings 5 years ago". By poe I kind of am able to get to the answer E , bUT I don't understand why th…
"Downtown petropolis boasted over 100 large buildings 5 years ago".
By poe I kind of am able to get to the answer E , bUT I don't understand why that is the answer.
Why "significantly fewer than 60"?? Is 100 the staple number of buildings ... -
pt 58 section 4 #17Premise ~Nobility -----> ~ Tragedy (~ = negative) Conclusion ~Fate -------> ~ Tragedy It is obvious we must link the concept of Nobili…
Premise
~Nobility -----> ~ Tragedy
(~ = negative)
Conclusion
~Fate -------> ~ Tragedy
It is obvious we must link the concept of Nobility and Fate. Making D right.
My ... -
pt 65 section 4 # 14Main Point question, I agonize between B and E. B is wrong because they never said it was not the only factor? But isn't E wrong as well because t…
Main Point question, I agonize between B and E. B is wrong because they never said it was not the only factor? But isn't E wrong as well because the conclusion was about unlikely that a prediction will occur where as E said probably will not? Isn't E ... -
PT 26 Section 4 Bus GameHello, I am having a trouble understanding this rule: H occupies the aisle seat immediately behind G's aisle seat. Why are we putting G in the ais…
Hello, I am having a trouble understanding this rule:
H occupies the aisle seat immediately behind G's aisle seat. Why are we putting G in the aisle seat? What about this:
3 _ H
2 G _
1 _ _
Isn't ... -
"Only" Question<b></b>I'm having trouble translating "only" statements... can anyone help me out? For example: <b>Only</b> the best artworks are beautiful. (P…
... the best artworks are beautiful. (PT 49, Section 4, Question 16)
Flaw questions: Sufficiency necessity confusionI got a question for high scorers; when you see an argument like PT 22 - Section 4 - Question 21 that have sufficiency necessity confusion but you de…
... you see an argument like PT 22 - Section 4 - Question 21 that have ...How to diagram "is"/"usually"How do you diagram "is"/"usually" statements? For example, PT 54 Section 4 Q 22. "The morally preferable act is usually the one that serves the lo…
... "is"/"usually" statements? For example, PT 54 Section 4 Q 22.
Preptests misspelling or missing words?As I am going through the CC I have noticed in at least two PTs that there have been a misspelled or missing word in a question. The first time I…
... more game changing. In my PT 22, Section 4, Question 14, answer choice ... experienced a difference between their PT's language and what 7sage ... ? I'm not worried my PT's are severely messed up ...Descriptive premises with normative conclusions in sufficient assumption questionsIs it always the case that if an argument for a sufficient assumption question has descriptive premises with a normative conclusion (saying one shoul…
... />
Looking at PT 22, Section 4, Q13 and PT 62, Section 2, Q17, I ...PTA.S4.Q10 - the therapist's reply to the interviewerWhat does answer choice A mean to you? Coming out of Feb 1996 PT 14 Section 4 Question 10. Question stem: The therapist's reply to the interviewe…
PrepTest 7 - Section 4 - Question 02I have no idea how the answer is E. I am not connecting anything here. Can someone please explain.
I have no idea how the answer is E. I am not connecting anything here. Can someone please explain.Some and MostYou can do: P: A some B C: A most B But you cannot do: P: A most B C: A some B Is this right? Some includes most, which is why in the …
... reference, I was confused on PT 42, Section 4, Number 22 which is ...Where can I find LR video explanations?I'm working through some LR drills and going over my wrong answers, but can't seem to find video explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT 15 Section 2, an…
... video explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT 15 Section 2, and PT A Section 4. Any ideas ... to find PT 3, but couldn't get videos for section 4 specifically ... . Same goes for the other PT videos I ...PTB.S4.Q25 - Some residents of Midville claim...Hi everyone! I just took five practice questions and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or has worked on it recently,…
... five practice questions and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone ...PT9.S4.Q20 - Of every 100 burglar alarms police answer...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20?PT3.S4.Q20 - Argument Part QuestionCan anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me.
Can anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me.Strengthening Causal ReasoningWhen it comes to strengthening causal reasoning, I understand that offering other instances where a cause leads to an effect (cause -> effect) will a…
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
Preptest 7, Section 4, Question #:12
This ...
